NC State University


A Profile of Entering Transfer Students
1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Return to UPA Survey Page
Return to UPA Home Page


A Profile of Entering Transfer Students
1995

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview

This report presents a profile of the 1995 entering Transfer students at NC State. It is based on responses to a survey given during three summer and fall Transfer orientation sessions, and represents 52.6% of the 1995 Transfer student class. Students transferring into all programs were included (although no one transferring into the Agricultural Institute completed a survey). No significant differences by gender, ethnicity, or college/school were observed between the sample obtained and the population of entering Transfer students. Thus, the results may be regarded as broadly representative of the 1995 Transfer class. However, significant differences by gender, ethnicity, and/or college/school were found for many of the questions.

Factors rated as having the strongest influence on Transfer students' decision to transfer to NC State included: availability of program, location, academic reputation, and level of support for intended major. Females rated location as significantly more important than did Males, and African-American respondents felt scholarships and financial aid and publications from NC State were significantly stronger factors in the decision to transfer to NC State than did Whites.

Although Transfer students indicated they were moderately satisfied with the quality of their admissions processes, only one-fourth of the respondents indicated that they were able to apply for university, college, or department scholarships. Approximately two-thirds of Transfer students responded that the number of courses that actually transferred was about the number they were led to believe would transfer by their previous institution and by their NC State department. However, significant differences were found by both gender and ethnicity.

Transfer students rated the more specific job-related general education goals as highest in importance and in current level of development. Transfer students appeared to have a practical assessment of the importance of self-concept and a realistic self-assessment of their development on diversity issues.

Of the Transfer students who reported that they were financially independent, three-fourths reported their 1994 pre-tax income as $20,000 or less. One-third of Transfer students reported that they will be receiving need-based financial aid. Almost three-fourths of the respondents plan to be employed during the academic year, with one-third working 20 or more hours a week.

University Planning and Analysis would like to thank the Office of New Student Orientation and First Year Experience, and especially Dr. Roger Callanan, for assistance with the administration of this survey.

The 1995 Transfer Class

Transfer Student Issues

Admissions Process

Number of Courses Transferred

Preparation for College



Marketing Research

Educational Intent

Goals for Undergraduate Preparation

From a list of knowledge, skills, and personal development goals held by NC State for undergraduate preparation, Transfer students were asked to indicate their current level of development and the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey. The list was divided into twelve goals for general education specified by NC State, sixteen goals related to student personal development, and seven goals related to student world view.

General Education


Personal Development

World View

Interests and Background

Student Affairs Programs and Activities

Financial Aid

Income

Parent/Guardian Education

Employment During First Academic Year

Dependent Children


Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


Summary Comparison of 1995 First-Year and Transfer Respondents

Demographics

Marketing Research

Educational Intent

Goals for Undergraduate Preparation

From a list of knowledge, skills, and personal development goals held by NC State for undergraduate preparation, First-Year and Transfer students were asked to indicate their current level of development and the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey. The list was divided into twelve goals for general education specified by NC State, sixteen goals related to student personal development, and seven goals related to student world view.

General Education


Personal Development

World View

Summary

Background Information

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page



INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY

This report presents a profile of the 1995 entering Transfer students at NC State. It is based on responses to a survey given during three summer and fall Transfer orientation sessions. Students transferring into all programs, including the Agricultural Institute, were invited to orientation.

The total number of Transfer students who attended these orientation sessions was 906. A total of 670 usable surveys was analyzed, which represents 52.6% of the registered Transfer students for the fall 1995 semester. No significant differences by gender (Chi-sq. 0.0004, df=1, p<.01), by ethnicity (Chi-sq. 0.0209, df=2, p<.01), or by academic unit (Chi-sq. 4.43, df=9, p<.01) were observed between the sample obtained (survey respondents) and the population of registered students. No students transferring into the Agricultural Institute completed a survey instrument.

The 1995 survey was adapted from the 1995 First-Year Student Survey. Additional questions concerning issues specific to transfer students were included. A copy of the survey instrument is included in the appendix.

Summary statistics were calculated for the group as a whole and by gender, ethnicity, and academic unit (college/school). Tests of significance (Chi-square for frequency data, t-tests for gender means, and ANOVA with Duncan's multiple-range test for ethnicity means) were performed on all items. Selected items were also analyzed for significance by academic unit. The eleven sections of the report are outlined below.

Section I Demographics of the Transfer Class and Survey Respondents

Presents overall demographic profiles of the 1995 Transfer class and survey respondents.

Section II Transfer Student Issues

Reports responses to questions concerning student's experience with the transfer process (questions 10-20).

Section III Marketing Research

Presents those factors found to be influential in the decision to transfer to NC State (questions 2 and 3).

Section IV Educational Intent

Reports responses to several questions dealing with educational intent (questions 2, 4-9).

Section V General Education Goals

Provides ratings of current level of development and importance at the time of the survey of twelve goals for general education specified by NC State (question 21).

Section VI Personal Development Goals

Provides ratings of current level of development and importance at the time of the survey of sixteen goals related to student personal development (question 21).

Section VII World View Goals

Provides ratings of current level of development and importance at the time of the survey of seven goals related to student world view (question 21).

Section VIII Co-Curricular Interests

Presents responses to questions dealing with interest in co-curricular programs and activities (questions 22 and 23).

Section IX Background Information

Reports background information on areas such as financial aid received, employment plans, and other personal information (questions 24-31).

Section X Academic Unit Analysis

This section provides responses to selected questions by Transfer students enrolling in nine of NC State's eleven colleges and schools.

Section XI Comparison of 1995 First-Year and Transfer Respondents

This section presents a comparison of selected questions from the First-Year student survey and the Transfer student survey.

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION I

DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE TRANSFER CLASS AND SURVEY RESPONDENTS

This section presents the demographic breakdown of the 1995 Transfer class and of the survey respondents by gender, ethnicity, and academic unit. The Transfer class of 1995 numbered 1,235 four-year enrollees plus 38 enrollees in the Agricultural Institute (two-year program) for a total for this report of 1,273 fall enrollees. The total number of usable surveys was 670. No enrollees in the Agricultural Institute completed a usable survey.

Demographics by gender and ethnic group are listed in Table 1. The breakdown of the Transfer class by gender was: 41.6% Female and 58.4% Male; and by ethnicity was: 85.9% White, 4.8% African-American, and 9.3% Other Minorities. The breakdown of survey respondents by gender was: 41.5% Female and 58.5% Male; and by ethnicity was: 86.4% White, 4.6% African-American, and 9.0% Other Minorities.

Table 1: Demographics of Transfer Class and Survey Respondents
Ethnic
Transfer Class
Survey Respondents
Group
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total

African-American
35
6.6%
26
3.5%
61
4.8%
20
7.2%
11
2.8%
31
4.6%

Asian
27
5.1%
33
4.4%
60
4.7%
16
5.8%
14
3.6%
30
4.5%

Hispanic
11
2.1%
16
2.2%
27
2.1%
8
2.9%
11
2.8%
19
2.8%

International
11
2.1%
16
2.2%
27
2.1%
2
0.7%
7
1.8%
9
1.3%

Native American
3
0.6%
1
0.1%
4
0.3%
2
0.7%
0
0.0%
2
0.3%

White
442
83.6%
652
87.6%
1,094
85.9%
230
82.7%
349
89.0%
579
86.4%

Total
529
41.6%
744
58.4%
1,273
100.0%
278
41.5%
392
58.5%
670
100.0%

Classifications by academic unit are presented in Table 2. Transfer students are not eligible to enroll in the First Year College. The remaining ten units are: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences - Bachelor's (CALS), Agricultural Institute - Two-Year (AG.IN.), School of Design (DSGN), College of Education and Psychology (ED/PSY), College of Engineering (ENGIN), College of Forest Resources (FOR), College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS), College of Management (MGT), College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (PAMS), and College of Textiles (TEX). The College of Agriculture and Life Sciences is divided into those students in the Bachelor's program and those in the Agricultural Institute (Two-Year). The largest percentage of entering Transfer students is in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (21.7%), followed closely by the College of Humanities and Social Sciences (21.5%). Because only small numbers of students transferred into several of the academic units (especially the School of Design and the College of Textiles), and therefore small numbers completed a questionnaire, caution should be exercised when interpreting the results of this survey.

Table 2: Classifications by Academic Unit
Academic Unit
Transfer Class
Survey Respondents
Agriculture and Life Sciences (Bachelor's)
276
21.7%
165
24.6%
Design
20
1.6%
10
1.5%
Education and Psychology
55
4.3%
30
4.5%
Engineering
220
17.3%
130
19.4%
Forest Resources
75
5.9%
46
6.9%
Humanities and Social Sciences
274
21.5%
123
18.4%
Management
220
17.3%
120
17.9%
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
60
4.7%
32
4.8%
Textiles
35
2.7%
14
2.1%
Subtotal
1,235
97.0%
670
100.0%
Agricultural Institute (Two-Year)
38
3.0%
0
0.0%
Total
1,273
100.0%
670
100.0%

NOTE: Textile Engineering Undesignated is included in the College of Engineering for enrollment and in the College of Textiles for statistics.

1995 Transfer Class

Thirty-nine percent of the Transfer class began their tenure at NC State as a First-Year student, 43% transferred in as a Sophomore, 15% began as third- through fifth-year students, and 3% transferred into the Agricultural Institute.

The last institution attended by three-fourths (78%) of the Transfer students was another North Carolina institution (see Table 3). Of the 975 Transfer students who last attended North Carolina institutions, almost half (47%) were from two-year institutions (see Table 4). Of the 343 transfers from North Carolina doctoral-level schools, 231 (67%) were from NC State.

Table 3: Location of Last Institution Attended
State
Number
Percent
North Carolina
975
77.5
New York
38
3.0
Virginia
36
2.9
Florida
27
2.1
South Carolina
22
1.7
All others (<15 in each)
159
12.6

Table 4: Type of Institution Last Attended
Type of Institution
All Transfers
Transfers from NC Institutions
Doctorate
437
34.7%
343
35.2%
Intermediate
83
6.6%
64
6.6%
Master's
78
6.2%
44
4.5%
First Professional
1
0.1%
0
0.0%
4 or 5 year Bachelor's
95
7.6%
70
7.2%
2 but < 4-year degree
563
44.8%
454
46.6%


Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION II

TRANSFER STUDENT ISSUES

This section reports responses to questions concerning students' experience with the transfer process.

Admissions

Transfer students were asked their level of satisfaction with four admissions processes. The rating scale used was: 4 = Very Satisfied, 3 = Moderately Satisfied, 2 = Moderately Dissatisfied, and 1 = Dissatisfied. Results are presented in Table 5. Respondents were moderately satisfied with their admissions, academic advising, and registration experiences. Significant differences by ethnicity were found for two of the areas. African-Americans were significantly more satisfied (p<0.05) with the university and departmental admissions processes than were Other Minorities.

Table 5: Satisfaction With the Quality of Admissions Processes (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Satisfaction with overall registration process
3.13
3.18
3.09
3.43
3.12
3.10
0.77
0.76
0.77
0.90
0.76
0.71
Satisfaction with university admissions process
3.20
3.25
3.16
3.41*
3.21
2.95^
0.77
0.77
0.78
0.68
0.76
0.87
Satisfaction with departmental admissions process
3.27

3.33

3.22

3.52*

3.28

3.04^
0.73
0.72
0.73
0.58
0.71
0.92
Satisfaction with academic advising
3.13
3.09
3.16
3.26
3.13
3.08
0.92
0.93
0.91
1.05
0.90
1.04
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Table 6 lists the satisfaction with admissions processes by academic units. Significant differences (p<0.05) by unit were observed on satisfaction with the overall registration process and departmental admissions process.

Table 6: Satisfaction With the Quality of Admissions Processes - by Academic Unit (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Satisfaction with overall registration process *
3.13
3.15
3.13
2.98
3.04
2.63
0.77
0.80
0.77
0.58
0.77
0.92
Satisfaction with university admissions process
3.20
3.31
3.05
3.13
3.07
3.09
0.77
0.69
0.80
0.72
0.78
0.94
Satisfaction with departmental admissions process *
3.27

3.36

3.21

3.18

3.13

2.55
0.73
0.68
0.76
0.62
0.90
1.13
Satisfaction with academic advising
3.13
3.19
3.19
3.16
3.25
2.57
0.92
0.93
0.93
0.73
1.04
1.13


Mean and Standard Deviation

All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Satisfaction with overall registration process *
3.13
2.50
3.42
3.19
3.16
0.77
0.97
0.70
0.79
0.67
Satisfaction with university admissions process
3.20
2.80
3.28
3.28
3.22
0.77
0.92
0.80
0.85
0.74
Satisfaction with departmental admissions process *
3.27

3.30

3.39

3.34

3.26
0.73
0.67
0.79
0.69
0.69
Satisfaction with academic advising
3.13
2.57
3.35
3.02
3.07
0.92
0.98
0.75
0.93
0.93
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Over two-thirds of Transfer students indicated that they were able to register for the courses they needed or wanted (see Table 7). Significant differences by ethnicity were found (p<0.05), with almost all (92%) of African-Americans responding that they were able to register for the courses they needed or wanted, as opposed to only 73% of Whites and 61% of Other Minorities. Significant differences (p<0.05) by academic unit were observed.

Table 7: Ability to Register for Courses Needed or Wanted (N=670)
Able to register for courses needed/wanted (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Yes
72.3
70.7
73.4
92.0
72.5
61.4
No
27.7
29.3
26.6
8.0
27.5
38.6
Ethnicity: p<0.05

Able to register for courses needed/wanted (%)
All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Yes
72.3
69.2
82.0
71.1
73.3
44.4
No
27.7
30.8
18.0
28.9
26.7
55.6
Academic Unit: p<0.05

Able to register for courses needed/wanted (%)
All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Yes
72.3
44.4
66.7
75.4
67.1
No
27.7
55.6
33.3
24.6
32.9
Academic Unit: p<0.05

Only approximately one-fourth (23%) of Transfer students indicated that they were able to apply for university, college, or department scholarships (see Table 8). However, significantly more (p<0.01) Males (27%) than Females (17%) said they were able to apply for these scholarships. No significant differences were found by academic unit.





Table 8: Ability to Apply for Scholarships (N=670)
Able to apply for scholarships (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Yes
22.6
16.6
26.9
17.9
23.2
19.3
No
77.4
83.4
73.1
82.1
76.8
80.7
Gender: p<0.01

Able to apply for scholarships (%)
All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Yes
22.6
29.3
26.9
24.4
12.9
10.0
No
77.4
70.7
73.1
75.6
87.1
90.0

Able to apply for scholarships (%)
All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Yes
22.6
25.0
24.1
14.2
19.3
No
77.4
75.0
75.9
85.8
80.7

Courses Transferred

Transfer students were asked two questions about the number of their courses that actually transferred to NC State. The results for the first question are presented in Table 9. Sixty percent of the students responded that the number of courses that actually transferred was about the number they were led to believe would transfer by their previous institution. However, significantly more Males (p<0.01) than Females and more Whites and Other Minorities (p<0.001) than African-Americans said the number which transferred was less than they expected. Significant differences (p<0.05) by academic unit were observed.

Table 9: Number of Courses Transferred vs. Previous Institution (N=670)
Number of courses actually transferred match what previous institution said (%)

All


Female


Male

African- American


White

Other Minorities
More than I expected
13.0
17.4
10.0
40.7
12.1
8.6
About what I expected
60.1
60.2
60.0
48.2
60.5
62.1
Less than I expected
26.9
22.4
30.0
11.1
27.4
29.3
Gender: p<0.01; Ethnicity: p<0.001

Number of courses actually transferred match what previous institution said (%)

All


CALS


ENGIN


FOR


PAMS


TEX
More than I expected
13.0
13.9
5.7
2.2
16.7
9.1
About what I expected
60.1
65.2
57.7
64.4
56.7
45.5
Less than I expected
26.9
20.9
36.6
33.3
26.7
45.5
Academic Unit: p<0.05

Number of courses actually transferred match what previous institution said (%)

All


DSGN


ED/PSY


CHASS


MGT
More than I expected
13.0
12.5
20.7
22.3
11.5
About what I expected
60.1
62.5
55.2
53.7
64.4
Less than I expected
26.9
25.0
24.1
24.0
24.0
Academic Unit: p<0.05

More than two-thirds (71%) of Transfer students responded that the number of courses that actually transferred was about the number they were led to believe would transfer by their NC State department (see Table 10). Significantly (p<0.01) more Males (21%) than Females (16%) felt the number that transferred was less than they expected. Significant differences (p<0.01) by ethnicity were also found, with more Other Minorities (31%) than Whites (18%) or African-Americans (11%) indicating the number that transferred was less than they expected. No significant differences were found by academic unit.

Table 10: Number of Courses Transferred vs. NC State Department (N=670)
Number of courses actually transferred match what NC State department said (%)

All


Female


Male

African- American


White

Other Minorities
More than I expected
10.1
14.9
6.8
25.0
9.9
5.2
About what I expected
70.7
69.0
71.9
64.3
71.8
63.8
Less than I expected
19.2
16.1
21.3
10.7
18.3
31.0
Gender: p<0.01; Ethnicity: p<0.01

Number of courses actually transferred match what NC State department said (%)

All


CALS


ENGIN


FOR


PAMS


TEX
More than I expected
10.1
12.1
4.1
0.0
10.0
18.2
About what I expected
70.7
68.8
71.1
84.4
73.3
63.6
Less than I expected
19.2
19.1
24.8
15.6
16.7
18.2

Number of courses actually transferred match what NC State department said (%)

All


DSGN


ED/PSY


CHASS


MGT
More than I expected
10.1
0.0
17.9
17.0
8.7
About what I expected
70.7
62.5
64.3
66.1
74.8
Less than I expected
19.2
37.5
17.9
17.0
16.5

Preparation for College

Three questions pertaining to preparation for college were asked of Transfer students. Results are presented in Tables 11 through 13. Over half (54%) of the respondents felt their previous institution had prepared them well for further study, and over half (52%) felt they had prepared themselves well for college. However, only 29% felt their high school had prepared them well for college, while 47% felt they were adequately prepared.

Significant differences were found for only one of the three questions. Table 12 reveals that significantly more (p<0.01) African-Americans (17%) than Whites (3%) or Other Minorities (3%) felt their last institution prepared them poorly for further study. Significant differences (p<0.05) were also found by academic unit for this question.

Table 11: High School Preparation for College (N=670)
How well high school prepared you for college (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Well prepared
29.1
31.2
27.7
43.3
27.8
35.0
Adequately prepared
47.4
49.3
46.0
40.0
47.1
53.3
Poorly prepared
23.5
19.6
26.4
16.7
25.1
11.8

How well high school prepared you for college (%)
All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Well prepared
29.1
26.1
30.2
23.9
31.3
35.7
Adequately prepared
47.4
54.7
40.3
45.7
56.3
42.9
Poorly prepared
23.5
19.3
29.5
30.4
12.5
21.4

How well high school prepared you for college (%)
All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Well prepared
29.1
10.0
23.3
29.3
35.6
Adequately prepared
47.4
50.0
53.3
46.3
43.2
Poorly prepared
23.5
40.0
23.3
24.4
21.2


Table 12: Previous Institution Preparation for College (N=670)
How well your last institution prepared you for further study (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Well prepared
54.4
54.4
54.4
50.0
55.6
45.0
Adequately prepared
41.6
40.6
42.3
33.3
41.0
51.7
Poorly prepared
4.1
5.1
3.3
16.7
3.4
3.3
Ethnicity: p<0.01

How well your last institution prepared you for further study (%)
All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Well prepared
54.4
54.6
49.2
60.9
56.3
57.1
Adequately prepared
41.6
43.6
47.7
39.1
43.8
42.9
Poorly prepared
4.1
1.8
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
Academic Unit: p<0.05

How well your last institution prepared you for further study (%)
All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Well prepared
54.4
40.0
63.3
57.7
51.7
Adequately prepared
41.6
50.0
30.0
31.7
44.9
Poorly prepared
4.1
10.0
6.7
10.6
3.4
Academic Unit: p<0.05

Table 13: Self-Preparation for College (N=670)
How well you prepared yourself for college (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Well prepared
51.9
52.7
51.3
66.7
51.3
50.0
Adequately prepared
45.0
44.8
45.1
33.3
45.1
50.0
Poorly prepared
3.1
2.5
3.6
0.0
3.6
0.0

How well you prepared yourself for college (%)
All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Well prepared
51.9
47.9
58.5
47.8
43.8
42.9
Adequately prepared
45.0
47.2
38.5
52.2
50.0
57.1
Poorly prepared
3.1
4.9
3.1
0.0
6.3
0.0

How well you prepared yourself for college (%)
All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Well prepared
51.9
50.0
70.0
48.8
53.8
Adequately prepared
45.0
50.0
30.0
48.0
43.7
Poorly prepared
3.1
0.0
0.0
3.3
2.5

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION III

MARKETING RESEARCH

This section presents those factors found to be influential in the decision to transfer to NC State.

Factors Influencing Transfer Decision

Transfer students were asked to indicate the extent that any of seventeen listed factors influenced their decision to transfer to NC State. The scale used was: 5 = Very Strong Influence, 4 = Strong Influence, 3 = Moderate Influence, 2 = Weak Influence, and 1 = Very Weak Influence. The means and standard deviations for each factor, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, is listed in Table 14.

Availability of program was rated as having the strongest influence on Transfer students' decision to transfer to NC State. Other strong influences were: location, academic reputation, and level of support for intended major. Females rated three of the factors as having a significantly stronger influence than did Males, especially location (p<0.001). Males rated attendance at a College Fair slightly stronger (p<0.05) than did Females.

Six factors were rated significantly different by the three ethnic groups. In particular, African-American respondents felt number of hours transferred/credited (p<0.05), scholarships and financial aid (p<0.01), and publications from NC State (p<0.01) were significantly stronger factors than did Whites.

Respondents were given a choice to list any other factor that they felt had an influence on their decision to transfer to NC State. Forty-six students provided an other factor. The overall mean for this category was 3.96 (SD = 1.40), which ranked as the second-strongest influence of all the factor choices. Factors listed in the other category by a number of respondents included: sports or athletics; ROTC, especially Navy ROTC; reputations of the College of Engineering, the School of Design, and the College of Veterinary Medicine; and the National Student Exchange program.

Significant differences were found by academic unit for seven of the factors (see Table 15). The breakdown of factors having the strongest influence by unit was: availability of program: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, School of Design, College of Engineering, College of Forest Resources, and College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences; location: College of Education and Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Management; and level of support for my intended major: College of Textiles.

Table 14: Factors Influencing Decision to Transfer to NC State (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Availability of program
4.00
4.02
3.99
4.13
3.99
4.02
1.00
1.01
1.00
1.12
1.00
0.96
Location
3.93
4.12***
3.80
4.23
3.94
3.74
1.09
1.03
1.12
0.77
1.11
1.09
Academic reputation
3.88
3.94
3.84
4.32*
3.87
3.75
0.89
0.94
0.85
0.75
0.87
1.06
Level of support for my intended major
3.67
3.73
3.62
3.87
3.66
3.66
1.10
1.09
1.10
0.92
1.10
1.13
Facilities and resources available
3.63
3.66
3.60
4.10*
3.60
3.64
1.04
1.04
1.04
0.88
1.05
1.01
Cost
3.32
3.41
3.25
3.53
3.30
3.38
1.18
1.24
1.13
1.17
1.18
1.18
Recommended by a friend, family member, teacher, counselor, etc.
3.17

3.22

3.13

2.96

3.16

3.35
1.27
1.28
1.25
1.08
1.28
1.20
Contact with a current student
2.99
3.18*
2.86
3.05
2.98
2.98
1.26
1.30
1.23
1.40
1.26
1.27
Number of hours transferred/credited
2.84
2.97*
2.74
3.37*
2.80^
2.93
1.20
1.23
1.17
1.16
1.20
1.17
Scholarships/financial aid available
2.73
2.84
2.64
3.43**
2.65^
2.98
1.25
1.33
1.17
1.29
1.23
1.23
Campus visit prior to orientation
2.71
2.78
2.67
3.25
2.67
2.83
1.27
1.28
1.26
1.54
1.25
1.18
Extracurricular opportunities
2.70
2.67
2.72
3.05
2.65
3.00
1.20
1.21
1.20
1.02
1.21
1.14
Size
2.63
2.55
2.69
2.76
2.59
2.94
1.11
1.09
1.13
1.09
1.11
1.14
Contact with a school official
2.61
2.60
2.61
2.84
2.58
2.76
1.16
1.17
1.16
1.12
1.18
1.02
Publications from NC State
2.40
2.37
2.41
3.00**
2.33^
2.81
1.15
1.14
1.15
1.00
1.14
1.12
Attendance at a College Fair
2.00
1.81
2.09*
1.91
1.94
2.63*
0.98
0.93
1.00
0.94
0.95
1.12
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Table 15: Factors Influencing Decision to Transfer to NC State - by Academic Unit (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Availability of program ***
4.00
4.24
4.22
4.02
4.06
4.46
1.00
0.93
0.95
1.11
0.85
0.66
Location ***
3.93
3.83
3.60
3.73
3.72
3.42
1.09
1.11
1.28
1.12
1.22
1.31
Academic reputation
3.88
3.89
4.04
3.72
3.81
4.29
0.89
0.88
0.89
0.81
0.93
0.91
Level of support for my intended major ***
3.67
3.73
3.84
3.82
3.72
4.50
1.10
1.17
1.11
1.03
1.20
0.76
Facilities and resources available
3.63
3.69
3.67
3.81
3.50
4.00
1.04
1.09
1.04
0.93
0.88
1.22
Cost **
3.32
3.12
3.17
3.48
3.84
2.77
1.18
1.11
1.19
1.11
0.90
1.48
Recommended by a friend, family member, teacher, counselor, etc.
3.17
3.16
3.12
3.15
2.64
3.91
1.27
1.30
1.28
1.12
1.22
1.04
Contact with a current student *
2.99
2.86
2.64
3.24
3.05
3.70
1.26
1.33
1.12
1.05
1.20
1.25
Number of hours transferred/credited
2.84
2.80
2.69
2.78
2.68
2.42
1.20
1.21
1.14
1.17
1.19
0.79
Scholarships/financial aid available
2.73
2.67
2.63
2.78
2.52
2.70
1.25
1.21
1.25
1.29
1.16
1.42
Campus visit prior to orientation
2.71
2.86
2.41
2.69
2.19
2.71
1.27
1.33
1.21
1.03
1.22
1.70
Extracurricular opportunities
2.70
2.78
2.45
2.66
2.52
2.64
1.20
1.18
1.28
1.03
1.27
1.12
Size *
2.63
2.74
2.46
2.59
2.33
2.64
1.11
1.25
1.05
0.92
1.09
1.29
Contact with a school official
2.61
2.65
2.62
2.59
2.44
2.44
1.16
1.16
1.19
1.13
1.26
1.33
Publications from NC State *
2.40
2.50
2.40
2.46
1.67
1.91
1.15
1.16
1.33
0.79
1.11
0.83
Attendance at a College Fair
2.00
2.09
1.86
2.33
1.82
1.50
0.98
1.00
1.03
0.91
1.17
0.58
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Table 15: (continued)


Mean and Standard Deviation

All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Availability of program ***
4.00
5.00
3.93
3.62
3.67
1.00
0.00
0.86
1.01
1.03
Location ***
3.93
3.30
4.20
4.28
4.25
1.09
1.16
0.81
0.83
0.89
Academic reputation
3.88
3.67
3.93
3.74
3.90
0.89
1.00
0.91
1.00
0.74
Level of support for my intended major ***
3.67
4.50
3.64
3.43
3.38
1.10
1.27
0.95
1.04
0.94
Facilities and resources available
3.63
3.30
3.76
3.57
3.46
1.04
1.57
0.83
1.05
1.02
Cost **
3.32
3.56
3.21
3.54
3.38
1.18
1.42
1.32
1.18
1.18
Recommended by a friend, family member, teacher, counselor, etc.
3.17

3.25

3.33

3.16

3.27
1.27
1.49
1.30
1.28
1.24
Contact with a current student *
2.99
2.63
3.21
3.21
3.05
1.26
0.92
1.31
1.39
1.20
Number of hours transferred/credited
2.84
1.80
3.07
3.80
2.92
1.20
1.30
1.47
1.21
1.17
Scholarships/financial aid available
2.73
2.56
3.08
2.87
2.70
1.25
1.51
1.53
1.32
1.11
Campus visit prior to orientation
2.71
2.63
3.00
2.70
2.91
1.27
1.19
1.14
1.26
1.29
Extracurricular opportunities
2.70
2.40
2.38
2.92
2.78
1.20
0.89
1.12
1.26
1.17
Size *
2.63
1.63
2.43
2.73
2.78
1.11
0.74
1.03
1.07
1.07
Contact with a school official
2.61
2.60
3.00
2.66
2.43
1.16
1.14
1.12
1.20
1.09
Publications from NC State *
2.40
2.25
3.20
2.44
2.21
1.15
0.96
0.77
1.21
0.95
Attendance at a College Fair
2.00
1.00
2.20
1.95
2.00
0.98
0.00
1.10
0.94
0.94
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Single Most Influential Factor

After having rated the individual importance of factors affecting their decision to transfer to NC State, Transfer students were then asked to pick the single most influential factor in that decision. The factors are listed, in order from decreasing percentage chosen, in Table 16. The highest percentage chose availability of program (25%), followed by location (22%) and academic reputation (21%).

No significant differences were found by gender or by ethnicity. Females chose location (28%) as the single most influential factor while Males chose availability of program (27%). African-Americans (45%) and Other Minorities (28%) chose academic reputation as the single most influential factor while Whites chose availability of program (26%).

Table 16: Single Most Influential Factor in Decision to Transfer to NC State (N=670)

Single most influential factor (%)

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Availability of program
25.3
23.5
26.5
16.1
26.4
19.3
Location
22.1
27.6
18.3
12.9
23.1
17.5
Academic reputation
20.5
19.9
20.9
45.2
18.4
28.1
Level of support for my intended major

8.8

6.3

10.6

6.5

8.9

8.8
Cost
6.8
5.9
7.5
3.2
6.8
8.8
Recommended by a friend, family member, teacher, counselor, etc.

2.7

2.9

2.6

0.0

2.6

5.3
Facilities and resources available

2.7

2.9

2.6

3.2

2.8

1.8
Other
2.6
2.6
2.6
0.0
3.0
0.0
Contact with a current student
2.1
2.9
1.5
0.0
1.9
5.3
Scholarships/financial aid available

1.4

1.5

1.3

3.2

1.2

1.8
Campus visit prior to orientation

1.1

0.4

1.5

3.2

1.0

0.0
Number of hours transferred/credited

1.1

1.1

1.0

0.0

1.0

1.8
Size
0.9
1.1
0.8
3.2
0.7
1.8
Extracurricular opportunities
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.0
0.9
0.0
Contact with a school official
0.6
0.4
0.8
0.0
0.7
0.0
Publications from NC State
0.5
0.0
0.8
3.2
0.3
0.0
Attendance at a College Fair
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0

Table 17 lists the percentages of the top two single most influential factors chosen by the respondents in each academic unit. Availability of program was one of the top two influential factors for seven of the nine colleges/schools in the decision to transfer to NC State. Significant differences (p<0.001) by unit were found.

Table 17: Top Two Factors Influencing Decision to Transfer to NC State - by Academic Unit (N=670)

Single most influential factor (%)

All

CALS

ENGIN

FOR

PAMS

TEX
Availability of program
25.3
34.8
32.3
40.0
23.3
21.4
Location
22.1
19.9
Academic reputation
20.5
32.3
20.0
Level of support for my intended major
8.8

13.3

21.4
Facilities/resources available
2.7
21.4
Academic Unit: p<0.001


Single most influential factor (%)

All

DSGN

ED/PSY

CHASS

MGT
Availability of program
25.3
60.0
14.9
Location
22.1
36.7
33.1
35.3
Academic reputation
20.5
23.3
14.9
26.1
Level of support for my intended major
8.8

20.0
Facilities/resources available
2.7
Academic Unit: p<0.001


Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page

SECTION IV

EDUCATIONAL INTENT

This section reports responses to several questions dealing with educational intent.

Previous Institutions

Two-thirds (67%) of Transfer students indicated that they had attended only one institution before enrolling at NC State (see Table 18). Twenty-three percent had attended two institutions previously.

Table 18: Number of Institutions Attended Before Enrolling (N=670)
Institutions attended before enrolling at NC State (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
One
66.5
62.1
69.6
70.0
67.0
59.6
Two
22.9
25.7
20.9
13.3
22.6
31.6
Three
6.9
6.6
7.0
6.7
7.0
5.3
Four
2.8
4.0
1.9
6.7
2.7
1.8
More than Four
0.9
1.5
0.5
3.3
0.7
1.8

College Major

Ninety-one percent of Transfer students reported being certain or very certain of their college major (see Table 19). No significant differences by gender or ethnicity were found.

Table 19: Certainty of College Major (N=670)

Certainty of college major (%)

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Very uncertain
1.4
2.2
0.8
0.0
1.4
1.7
Uncertain
8.0
5.4
9.7
6.7
8.5
3.3
Certain
41.0
41.3
40.8
33.3
41.7
38.3
Very certain
49.7
51.1
48.7
60.0
48.4
56.7

Intent

As reported in Table 20, the primary goal or objective for Transfer students attending NC State is to obtain a bachelor's degree as preparation for further schooling (47%) or to obtain a bachelor's degree as preparation for a career (40%). Significant differences (p<0.001) were found by gender, with more Females (58%) than Males (39%) preparing for further schooling and more Males (46%) than Females (31%) preparing for a career.

Students were given a chance to list any other goal or objective that they felt was their primary reason for attending NC State. Very few students specified a separate goal. The only responses listed by more than one student were: to take courses for a year and then transfer, and to prepare for the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program.

Table 20: Primary Goal/Objective for Attending (N=670)
Primary goal or objective for attending NC State (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Bachelor's degree as preparation for school

46.7

57.8

38.8

64.5

44.8

55.9
Bachelor's degree as preparation for career

39.8

30.7

46.3

25.8

41.7

28.8
Bachelor's degree or certificate only

9.9

9.0

10.5

3.2

9.9

13.6
Improve for current profession
1.7
1.1
2.1
3.2
1.7
0.0
Other
1.5
1.1
1.8
3.2
1.4
1.7
Courses for personal interest
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
Gender: p<0.001

Educational Aspirations

Transfer students were asked the highest level of education they planned to complete. Table 21 reveals that over one-third (34%) plan to complete only a bachelor's degree, while forty-one percent plan to complete a master's degree. Significant differences were found by both gender (p<0.001) and ethnicity (p<0.01). More Males (41%) than Females (25%) plan to stop with a bachelor's degree, while more Females (33%) than Males (20%) plan to complete a doctoral or other professional degree. Forty-five percent of African-Americans plan to complete a doctoral or other professional degree, whereas only twenty-three percent of Whites and thirty-two percent of Other Minorities have such plans.


Table 21: Highest Level of Education Planned (N=670)
Highest level of education plan to complete (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Certificate
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bachelor's degree
34.1
24.9
40.6
9.7
36.7
22.0
Master's degree
40.5
42.5
39.1
45.2
39.7
45.8
Doctoral degree
14.2
15.4
13.4
19.4
13.6
16.9
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine

5.1

9.2

2.3

6.5

4.7

8.5
Other professional degree
5.7
8.1
4.1
19.4
4.9
6.8
Do not intend to complete a degree

0.3

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.3

0.0
Gender: p<0.001; Ethnicity: p<0.01

Time to Degree Completion

The data in Table 22 reveal that most Transfer students plan to complete their bachelor's degree in either two years (40%) or three years (45%). Significant differences were found by both gender (p<0.05) and ethnicity (p<0.01). More Males (50%) than Females (38%) plan to take three years to complete the degree. Two-thirds (68%) of African-Americans plan to complete the degree in two years, but fewer Whites (39%) and Other Minorities (40%) plan to take only two years.

Table 22: Intended Length of Time to Completion (N=670)
Intended length of time to complete bachelor's degree (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
1 year
2.0
3.3
1.0
3.2
1.4
6.7
2 years
40.3
45.8
36.4
67.7
38.9
40.0
3 years
44.8
37.5
50.0
22.6
47.2
33.3
4 years
9.2
10.2
8.5
3.2
9.1
13.3
More than 4 years
2.7
2.2
3.1
3.2
2.3
6.7
Will not complete bachelor's
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
Gender: p<0.05; Ethnicity: p<0.01

Enrollment

Transfer students' responses to two questions concerning their enrollment plans are presented in Tables 23 and 24. Just over half (52%) of the respondents plan to enroll in 15 or more credit hours of classes, and forty percent plan to enroll in 12-14 credit hours of classes. Only eleven percent of Transfer students plan to take the majority of their courses in the late afternoon and evening hours.

Table 23: First Semester Enrollment (N=670)
First semester enrollment status (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
15 credit hours of classes or more

52.0

55.8

49.2

73.3

51.6

45.0
12-14 credit hours of classes

40.4

36.9

43.0

26.7

40.5

46.7
Less than 12 credit hours of classes

7.6

7.3

7.8

0.0

7.9

8.3


Table 24: Courses in Late Afternoon/Evening (N=670)
Take a majority of courses in late afternoon/evening (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Yes
11.3
11.2
11.5
19.4
10.9
11.7

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION V

GENERAL EDUCATION GOALS

This section provides Transfer students' ratings of twelve goals for general education specified by NC State. Respondents were asked their current level of development in these goals as well as the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey.

The means and standard deviations for level of development, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 25. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very High, 4 = High, 3 = Average, 2 = Low, and 1 = Very Low. The general education goals in which Transfer students indicated the highest current level of development were: ability to plan and carry out projects independently, developing good listening skills, and acquiring a broad general education.

Significant differences by gender were found on development ratings for all goals except two. Males rated most of the mathematical- or science-based goals higher than did Females, while Females rated most communication skills and broad educational values higher than did Males. Significant differences by ethnicity were found for all goals except three. In particular, African-Americans rated their level of development on ability to communicate ideas in writing and ability to communicate ideas orally higher than Whites, who in turn rated their level of development higher than Other Minorities.

The means and standard deviations for goal importance, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 26. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very Important, 4 = Important, 3 = Moderately Important, 2 = Of Limited Importance, and 1 = Not Important. The goals Transfer students indicated were most important to them were: ability to plan and carry out projects independently, developing computer skills, and ability to communicate ideas orally.

Significant differences by gender were found for all goals except three. Females rated seven goals significantly higher than did Males, particularly the goals related to communication and listening skills. A significant difference by ethnicity was found only for understanding diverse cultures and values, with African-Americans rating this goal significantly higher than did Whites.

A comparison between the importance of these goals and the perceived current level of development in these areas revealed that Transfer students rated ability to plan and carry out projects independently as highest in importance and current level of development. Yet, they rated developing computer skills and ability to communicate ideas orally high in importance but low in current level of development.

Table 25: Current Level of Development of General Education Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Ability to plan and carry out projects independently
3.80
3.78
3.82
4.03
3.82
3.50**
0.80
0.81
0.80
0.93
0.78
0.86
Developing good listening skills
3.75
3.83*
3.69
4.13**
3.75
3.53
0.81
0.83
0.80
0.92
0.80
0.86
Acquiring a broad general education
3.72
3.80*
3.66
4.23***
3.69
3.67
0.75
0.76
0.73
0.72
0.73
0.80
Ability to critically analyze events, information and ideas
3.67

3.58

3.73*

3.87

3.70

3.25***
0.82
0.80
0.82
0.96
0.78
0.94
Developing good reading comprehension skills
3.63
3.73**
3.55
4.06**
3.63
3.38
0.88
0.89
0.87
0.85
0.86
0.98
Understanding how science and technology influence everyday life
3.62

3.40

3.77***

3.87

3.61

3.56
0.89
0.87
0.88
1.06
0.89
0.77
Ability to apply mathematics skills
3.53
3.30
3.70***
3.87
3.48**
3.83
0.94
0.96
0.90
1.02
0.93
0.94
Understanding diverse cultures and values
3.53
3.69***
3.41
4.03**
3.50
3.57
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.80
0.90
0.89
Ability to communicate ideas in writing
3.52
3.63*
3.45
4.00***
3.53***
3.20***
0.89
0.87
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.90
Ability to communicate ideas orally
3.43
3.38
3.47
4.00***
3.44***
3.05***
0.93
0.98
0.88
0.89
0.91
0.92
Ability to apply scientific principles
3.32
3.07
3.50***
3.55
3.32
3.20
0.94
0.92
0.92
1.02
0.94
0.92
Developing computer skills
3.15
3.04
3.24**
3.23
3.13
3.32
1.00
0.97
1.01
1.12
0.98
1.06
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Table 26: Importance of General Education Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Ability to plan and carry out projects independently
4.45
4.55**
4.38
4.45
4.46
4.40
0.72
0.64
0.77
0.89
0.72
0.65
Developing computer skills
4.43
4.45
4.41
4.48
4.43
4.35
0.79
0.75
0.82
1.03
0.77
0.88
Ability to communicate ideas orally
4.41
4.56***
4.30
4.73
4.39
4.45
0.80
0.67
0.87
0.78
0.80
0.75
Developing good listening skills
4.41
4.59***
4.29
4.61
4.39
4.47
0.80
0.64
0.88
0.88
0.80
0.70
Developing good reading comprehension skills
4.37
4.47**
4.30
4.55
4.36
4.37
0.81
0.70
0.87
0.85
0.82
0.69
Ability to critically analyze events, information and ideas
4.22

4.25

4.20

4.32

4.22

4.10
0.84
0.82
0.86
0.91
0.84
0.80
Ability to apply mathematics skills
4.21
4.12
4.28*
4.57
4.19
4.25
0.93
0.95
0.91
1.01
0.93
0.88
Ability to communicate ideas in writing
4.20
4.39***
4.07
4.45
4.18
4.27
0.90
0.74
0.98
0.93
0.91
0.80
Acquiring a broad general education
4.13
4.26**
4.03
4.45
4.10
4.21
0.99
0.91
1.04
0.96
1.01
0.83
Understanding how science and technology influence everyday life
4.09

4.04

4.13

4.13

4.10

4.02
0.95
0.90
0.99
1.12
0.96
0.85
Ability to apply scientific principles
3.96
3.82
4.05**
4.03
3.96
3.90
1.04
1.04
1.03
1.20
1.04
0.93
Understanding diverse cultures and values
3.84
4.16***
3.61
4.35**
3.79^
4.05
1.06
0.87
1.13
0.95
1.07
0.95
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION VI

PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS

This section provides Transfer students' ratings of sixteen goals related to student personal development. Respondents were asked their current level of development in these goals as well as the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey.

The means and standard deviations for level of development, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 27. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very High, 4 = High, 3 = Average, 2 = Low, and 1 = Very Low. The personal development goals in which Transfer students indicated the highest current level of development were: taking responsibility for my own behavior, viewing learning as a lifelong process, and being independent and self-reliant.

Significant differences by gender were found on half of the goals. In particular, Females rated viewing learning as a lifelong process higher than Males did, whereas Males rated having self-confidence and handling stress higher than did Females. Significant differences by ethnicity were found for three-fourths of the goals, with African-Americans rating those twelve goals the highest among all three ethnic groups. Of note is the difference in the goal of being independent and self-reliant. African-Americans rated their level of development on this goal higher than did Whites, who in turn rated their level of development higher than Other Minorities did.

The means and standard deviations for goal importance, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 28. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very Important, 4 = Important, 3 = Moderately Important, 2 = Of Limited Importance, and 1 = Not Important. The goals Transfer students indicated were most important to them were: taking responsibility for my own behavior, having self-discipline, and managing my time.

Significant differences by gender were found for all goals except two, with Females rating those fourteen goals higher than did Males. Significant differences by ethnicity were found only for three goals. African-Americans rated realizing my potential for success and clarifying personal identity higher than the other two ethnic groups did, and rated having self-discipline significantly higher than Other Minorities did.

A comparison between the importance of these goals and the perceived current level of development in these areas revealed that Transfer students rated taking responsibility for my own behavior highest in both importance and current level of development. However, respondents felt managing my time was high in importance but rated their current level of development low for this goal.

Table 27: Current Level of Development of Personal Development Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Taking responsibility for my own behavior
4.47
4.53*
4.42
4.77*
4.46
4.38
0.67
0.62
0.70
0.50
0.67
0.72
Viewing learning as a lifelong process
4.27
4.39***
4.18
4.55**
4.28
4.02^
0.78
0.76
0.78
0.68
0.78
0.78
Being independent and self-reliant
4.07
4.04
4.09
4.43***
4.09***
3.72***
0.85
0.86
0.85
0.77
0.82
1.06
Recognizing and acting upon ethical principles
4.03
4.14**
3.95
4.35*
4.03
3.87
0.75
0.76
0.74
0.61
0.75
0.83
Ability to function as part of a team
3.94
3.94
3.94
4.16
3.95
3.75
0.84
0.82
0.85
0.90
0.82
0.91
Understanding my own abilities and interests
3.91
3.88
3.94
4.31*
3.89
3.90
0.80
0.81
0.80
0.76
0.80
0.80
Clarifying personal identity
3.81
3.80
3.82
4.17
3.79
3.80
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.75
0.83
0.85
Having self-discipline
3.79
3.78
3.79
4.31**
3.76
3.78
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.76
0.90
0.83
Realizing my potential for success
3.76
3.65
3.84**
4.43***
3.73
3.75
0.85
0.86
0.84
0.77
0.84
0.84
Coping with change
3.73
3.65
3.79*
4.11
3.72
3.65
0.91
0.93
0.90
0.88
0.91
0.90
Having self-confidence
3.67
3.50
3.79***
4.52***
3.62
3.71
0.94
0.93
0.92
0.69
0.93
0.95
Improving leadership and management skills
3.64
3.56
3.70*
4.00**
3.65
3.38
0.86
0.87
0.84
0.97
0.83
0.95
Developing a commitment to personal health and fitness
3.61

3.60

3.61

4.03*

3.61

3.37
1.00
0.98
1.01
0.98
0.99
0.97
Handling stress
3.52
3.30
3.67***
3.77
3.52
3.42
0.96
0.96
0.93
1.10
0.95
0.91
Managing my time
3.47
3.48
3.47
4.00**
3.46
3.32
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.98
0.92
0.86
Being involved with public and community affairs
3.04
3.12
2.99
3.68***
3.01
3.03
0.98
1.00
0.97
1.05
0.97
0.97
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Table 28: Importance of Personal Development Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Taking responsibility for my own behavior
4.62
4.75***
4.53
4.87
4.61
4.61
0.70
0.55
0.78
0.73
0.70
0.67
Having self-discipline
4.59
4.68***
4.51
4.83*
4.59
4.45^
0.68
0.59
0.74
0.38
0.68
0.77
Managing my time
4.57
4.66**
4.51
4.77
4.57
4.48
0.69
0.62
0.73
0.50
0.68
0.82
Having self-confidence
4.55
4.66***
4.46
4.77
4.54
4.55
0.69
0.60
0.74
0.77
0.69
0.70
Being independent and self-reliant
4.51
4.64***
4.41
4.67
4.50
4.49
0.73
0.68
0.76
0.88
0.73
0.68
Realizing my potential for success
4.51
4.64***
4.41
4.87*
4.49
4.46
0.72
0.60
0.77
0.73
0.71
0.70
Handling stress
4.50
4.66***
4.39
4.53
4.51
4.41
0.73
0.63
0.78
0.86
0.73
0.72
Viewing learning as a lifelong process
4.43
4.60***
4.32
4.67
4.43
4.37
0.81
0.71
0.85
0.84
0.81
0.76
Understanding my own abilities and interests
4.40
4.53***
4.30
4.50
4.40
4.36
0.76
0.68
0.80
0.94
0.74
0.85
Improving leadership and management skills
4.39
4.43
4.35
4.43
4.40
4.25
0.80
0.73
0.84
0.94
0.79
0.80
Ability to function as part of a team
4.37
4.44
4.32
4.47
4.37
4.37
0.80
0.77
0.81
0.97
0.78
0.83
Recognizing and acting upon ethical principles
4.34
4.51***
4.21
4.50
4.34
4.20
0.80
0.67
0.85
0.86
0.79
0.82
Developing a commitment to personal health and fitness
4.31

4.45***

4.20

4.47

4.32

4.08
0.86
0.75
0.92
0.86
0.84
0.98
Clarifying personal identity
4.26
4.45***
4.12
4.64*
4.25
4.17
0.88
0.75
0.93
0.87
0.86
0.97
Coping with change
4.24
4.38***
4.13
4.24
4.25
4.12
0.86
0.77
0.91
0.99
0.86
0.85
Being involved with public and community affairs
3.80
3.97***
3.68
4.03
3.77
3.97
0.97
0.91
0.99
1.10
0.96
0.93
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category


Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION VII

WORLD VIEW GOALS

This section provides Transfer students' ratings of seven goals related to student world view. Respondents were asked their current level of development in these goals as well as the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey.

The means and standard deviations for level of development, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 29. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very High, 4 = High, 3 = Average, 2 = Low, and 1 = Very Low. The world view goals in which Transfer students indicated the highest current level of development were: valuing racial equity, valuing gender equity, and being able to interact and work with people from diverse backgrounds.

Significant differences by gender were found on all goals, with Females rating five (all the diversity-related goals) of the seven higher than did Males. Significant differences by ethnicity were found for four goals. African-Americans rated valuing racial equity and valuing gender equity higher than did the other two ethnic groups.

The means and standard deviations for goal importance, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are displayed in Table 30. The rating scale used was: 5 = Very Important, 4 = Important, 3 = Moderately Important, 2 = Of Limited Importance, and 1 = Not Important. The goals Transfer students indicated were most important to them were: valuing racial equity, valuing gender equity, and being able to interact and work with people from diverse backgrounds.

Significant differences by gender were found on six of the seven goals, with Females rating these goals higher than did Males. No significant differences by ethnicity were found.

An interesting finding was revealed when a comparison between the importance of these goals and the perceived current level of development in these areas was made. Transfer students rated the same three world view goals as highest in importance and highest in their current level of development.

Table 29: Current Level of Development of World View Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Valuing racial equity
4.09
4.30***
3.94
4.67**
4.07
4.02
0.90
0.79
0.94
0.55
0.89
1.03
Valuing gender equity
4.08
4.26***
3.95
4.53**
4.08
3.84
0.87
0.81
0.88
0.68
0.85
1.01
Being able to interact and work with people from diverse backgrounds
3.78

3.92***

3.69

4.20*

3.77

3.74
0.84
0.81
0.85
0.76
0.83
0.89
Having a tolerance for different points of view
3.72
3.86***
3.62
3.83
3.72
3.68
0.85
0.82
0.86
0.95
0.84
0.94
Understanding issues and problems facing the world
3.44
3.31
3.54***
3.67
3.45
3.29
0.83
0.79
0.84
0.99
0.81
0.86
Understanding the present as it relates to historical events/processes
3.39

3.20

3.52***

3.70**

3.40

3.14^
0.85
0.83
0.83
1.06
0.83
0.86
Advancing my appreciation of the arts, music and literature
3.37

3.50**

3.28

3.50

3.38

3.27
0.99
0.94
1.01
1.01
0.98
1.06
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Table 30: Importance of World View Goals (N=670)

Mean and Standard Deviation

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Valuing racial equity
4.27
4.52***
4.08
4.57
4.24
4.39
0.96
0.75
1.06
0.94
0.96
0.96
Valuing gender equity
4.25
4.49***
4.09
4.40
4.24
4.28
0.92
0.76
0.98
0.97
0.91
0.93
Being able to interact and work with people from diverse backgrounds
4.19

4.43***

4.02

4.50

4.18

4.17
0.89
0.71
0.97
0.94
0.90
0.78
Having a tolerance for different points of view
4.19
4.42***
4.03
4.30
4.20
4.12
0.92
0.76
0.99
1.02
0.92
0.91
Understanding issues and problems facing the world
4.09
4.21***
4.00
4.17
4.09
4.03
0.84
0.74
0.89
0.99
0.84
0.74
Understanding the present as it relates to historical events/processes
3.88

3.95

3.82

4.10

3.89

3.64
0.94
0.89
0.97
1.03
0.93
0.91
Advancing my appreciation of the arts, music and literature
3.72

3.97***

3.55

4.10

3.71

3.69
1.10
0.96
1.17
1.09
1.10
1.11
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05 ; ^ = significance comparison category

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION VIII

CO-CURRICULAR INTERESTS

This section presents responses to questions dealing with interest in co-curricular programs and activities. Transfer students were asked to indicate their interest in 26 NC State programs and activities. Additionally, they were asked whether they wanted their name provided to the University office in charge of the programs and activities in which they expressed an interest. The data in Table 31 reveal that ninety percent of the respondents gave permission to release their names.

Table 32 presents the percentage of respondents interested in each program or activity, in decreasing percentage order. The highest percentage of respondents were interested in the following programs or activities: fitness (49%), Outdoor Adventures (44%), intramurals (38%), and the Co-Op program (34%).

There were varying significant differences (p<0.05 or greater) found for both gender and ethnicity. For instance, Females were more interested than Males in fitness, healthy lifestyle issues, and Volunteer Services, whereas Males were more interested than Females in intramurals and club sports. African-Americans were more interested in social fraternity/sorority activities than were Whites or Other Minorities, and Whites were more interested in Outdoor Adventures than were the other two ethnic groups. Females and African-Americans were more interested in programs/services for children and families and gender issues than were their comparison groups.

Table 31: Permission to Provide Name (N=670)
Provide my name for programs/ activities interested in (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Yes
89.6
91.1
88.5
93.3
89.4
89.3
No
10.4
8.9
11.5
6.7
10.6
10.7

Table 32: Interest in Program or Activity (N=670)
Interest in program or activity (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Fitness
48.8
66.5
36.2
51.6
49.1
45.0
Outdoor Adventures
43.6
43.2
43.9
16.1
46.6
28.3
Intramurals
38.1
23.0
48.7
41.9
38.7
30.0
Co-Op Program
33.9
31.7
35.5
38.7
33.0
40.0
Healthy Lifestyles Issues
23.3
34.2
15.6
35.5
23.3
16.7
Volunteer Services
22.1
33.5
14.0
35.5
20.7
28.3
Indoor Recreation
18.5
19.8
17.6
25.8
18.3
16.7
Study Abroad/National Student Exchange
18.5

23.7

14.8

16.1

18.5

20.0
Club Sports
18.4
13.3
21.9
3.2
19.7
13.3
Social Fraternity/Sorority
17.8
18.3
17.3
51.6
16.8
10.0
Informal Recreation
17.8
14.0
20.4
3.2
18.8
15.0
Leadership Development Program
17.5

19.8

15.8

29.0

17.3

13.3
Gender Issues
13.7
27.3
4.1
38.7
13.1
6.7
Student Publications/ Media
13.0

16.2

10.7

16.1

13.0

11.7
Student Government
12.7
15.5
10.7
19.4
12.6
10.0
Theater
11.9
19.1
6.9
3.2
12.1
15.0
Programs/Services for Children/Families
9.6

16.9

4.3

25.8

9.3

3.3
College Bowl
9.0
6.8
10.5
6.5
8.6
13.3
International Student Programs
8.1

9.4

7.1

9.7

6.0

26.7
Crafts Program
7.3
14.7
2.0
3.2
8.1
1.7
Performing Arts Selection/Booking
7.2

10.4

4.8

3.2

7.4

6.7
Art Gallery Selection/Exhibition
6.6

10.1

4.1

9.7

6.2

8.3
ROTC
6.0
2.5
8.4
9.7
6.0
3.3
Performing Dance Ensembles
4.3

7.6

2.0

12.9

3.3

10.0
African-American Programs
3.6

5.0

2.6

74.2

0.2

0.0
Music Minor
3.3
3.6
3.1
6.5
2.9
5.0

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page



SECTION IX

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This section reports background information on areas such as financial aid received, employment plans, and other personal information.

Financial Aid

The percentages of respondents who indicated that they will be receiving various types of financial aid are presented in Table 33. Thirty-three percent of Transfer students will be receiving need-based financial aid. Significant differences (p<0.01) by ethnicity were found, with more African-Americans (55%) and Other Minorities (45%) receiving need-based aid than Whites (30%).

Table 33: Financial Aid (N=670)

Financial aid receiving (%)

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Financial need
32.8
36.3
30.4
54.8
30.4
45.0
Other
11.8
10.8
12.5
29.0
11.2
8.3
Academic
6.7
7.2
6.4
6.5
7.3
1.7
Athletic-based
0.6
0.4
0.8
3.2
0.3
1.7
Ethnicity: p<0.01

Income Information

Transfer students were asked to report their 1994 pre-tax income if they were financially independent. Of the 291 students who responded to this question, forty-seven percent said they made $10,000 or less last year, and twenty-seven percent had an income between $10,001 and $20,000 (see Table 34).

If the respondent was listed as a dependent by their parent/guardian, they were asked to report their parent's or guardian's combined 1994 pre-tax income (see Table 35). Fifty-four percent reported an income between $30,001 and $75,000, while nine percent reported this income to be $20,000 or below. Significant differences (p<0.001) by ethnicity were found. Fifty-eight percent of Whites reported their parent/guardian's income to be between $30,001 and $75,000, whereas twenty-nine percent of Other Minorities and twenty-two percent of African-Americans reported the income in this range.


Table 34: Independent Student Income (N=670)

Your income (%)

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
$10,000 or less
47.1
43.7
49.7
55.6
45.8
54.2
$10,001 - $20,000
26.8
31.0
23.6
27.8
26.9
25.0
$20,001 - $30,000
13.4
10.3
15.8
5.6
14.1
12.5
$30,001 - $40,000
6.5
6.3
6.7
5.6
6.8
4.2
$40,001 - $50,000
1.7
2.4
1.2
0.0
2.0
0.0
$50,001 - $60,000
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.4
0.0
$60,001 - $75,000
1.7
2.4
1.2
5.6
1.2
4.2
$75,001 - $100,000
1.4
1.6
1.2
0.0
1.6
0.0
More than $100,000
1.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0

Table 35: Parent/Guardian Income (N=670)

Parent/Guardian income (%)

All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
$10,000 or less
2.8
2.6
2.8
5.6
1.8
10.5
$10,001 - $20,000
6.5
9.9
4.5
33.3
3.5
21.1
$20,001 - $30,000
12.8
13.9
12.1
27.8
11.1
21.1
$30,001 - $40,000
13.8
10.6
15.8
5.6
14.6
10.5
$40,001 - $50,000
13.6
13.9
13.4
5.6
14.3
10.5
$50,001 - $60,000
10.8
9.3
11.7
0.0
12.0
5.3
$60,001 - $75,000
15.8
15.9
15.8
11.1
17.5
2.6
$75,001 - $100,000
13.3
13.2
13.4
5.6
14.0
10.5
More than $100,000
10.6
10.6
10.5
5.6
11.1
7.9
Ethnicity: p<0.001

Parent/Guardian Education

Transfer students were asked to report the education level of each parent/guardian. The data in Tables 36 and 37 reveal that sixty-six percent indicated that their father/male guardian had at least some college, and sixty percent indicated that their mother/female guardian had at least some college. Significant differences were found by ethnicity (p<0.001) for both father/male guardian and mother/female guardian.

Table 36: Father/Male Guardian Education (N=670)
Father/Male Guardian education (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Eighth grade or less
2.6
2.9
2.3
6.5
1.4
11.9
Some high school
4.1
3.3
4.7
0.0
4.2
5.1
High school graduate
27.7
27.0
28.2
41.9
28.6
11.9
1-2 yrs college
24.7
22.3
26.4
29.0
24.9
20.3
3-4 yrs college
25.1
25.5
24.8
6.5
25.2
33.9
5-6 yrs college
9.3
10.9
8.1
6.5
9.5
8.5
>6 yrs college
6.5
8.0
5.5
9.7
6.2
8.5
Ethnicity: p<0.001

Table 37: Mother/Female Guardian Education (N=670)
Mother/Female Guardian education (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Eighth grade or less
1.7
2.2
1.3
0.0
0.7
11.9
Some high school
4.0
4.0
3.9
6.5
3.5
6.8
High school graduate
34.1
36.9
32.2
35.5
33.9
35.6
1-2 yrs college
29.7
27.4
31.4
32.3
30.9
16.9
3-4 yrs college
22.1
21.2
22.8
16.1
22.3
23.7
5-6 yrs college
7.0
6.6
7.3
3.2
7.6
3.4
>6 yrs college
1.4
1.8
1.0
6.5
1.1
1.7
Ethnicity: p<0.001

Employment Plans

Two questions on employment plans were asked of Transfer students. The data in Table 38 reveal an almost even split among the four categories of responses. Slightly over one-fourth (27%) do not plan to work during the academic year, and twenty-six percent plan to work 20 or more hours a week.

Almost half of Transfer students (49%) plan to seek employment in North Carolina after graduation, and thirty-four percent do not plan to limit their employment location (see Table 39). Significant differences by ethnicity (p<0.001) were found. White students (52%) were more likely to limit their search to North Carolina than were African-Americans (38%) and Other Minorities (28%).



Table 38: Employment Plans During Academic Year (N=670)
Employment during academic year (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
20 or more hrs/wk
26.2
24.0
27.8
41.4
25.8
22.4
11-19 hrs/wk
24.5
26.2
23.2
31.0
24.9
17.2
1-10 hrs/wk
22.3
25.5
20.0
3.4
23.3
22.4
Do not plan to work
27.0
24.4
28.9
24.1
26.0
37.9

Table 39: Employment After Graduation (N=670)
Where plan to seek employment after graduation (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
In North Carolina
49.1
53.5
45.9
37.9
51.9
28.1
Outside NC but in USA
11.7
10.4
12.7
10.3
11.2
17.5
Outside the USA
1.4
2.2
0.8
0.0
0.5
10.5
Anywhere
33.8
29.0
37.3
37.9
33.5
35.1
Will not seek employment
3.9
4.8
3.2
13.8
2.9
8.8
Ethnicity: p<0.001

Dependent Children

Sixty-five Transfer students (10%) indicated that they had dependent children (see Table 40). Significant differences by gender (p<0.05) were found, with more Males (92%) than Females (86%) responding that they did not have dependent children. The number of respondents indicating having a dependent child in each of five age categories is listed in Table 41.

Table 40: Number of Dependent Children (N=670)
Number of dependent children (%)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
None
89.8
86.3
92.3
75.9
90.4
91.2
1
4.9
6.3
3.8
17.2
4.2
5.3
2
3.8
5.9
2.2
3.4
3.8
3.5
3 or more
1.6
1.5
1.6
3.4
1.6
0.0
Gender: p<0.05

Table 41: Number Indicating Age of Dependent Children (N=670)
Ages of dependent children (Number)
All

Female

Male
African- American

White
Other Minorities
Infant
18
7
11
2
14
2
Pre-school
23
16
7
4
17
2
Elementary school
23
12
11
1
20
2
Secondary
14
9
5
1
12
1
18 yrs. and older
5
4
1
1
4
0

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION X

ACADEMIC UNIT ANALYSIS

NC State's undergraduate offerings for Transfer students are divided into ten academic units: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences - Bachelor's (CALS), Agricultural Institute - Two-Year (AG.IN.), School of Design (DSGN), College of Education and Psychology (ED/PSY), College of Engineering (ENGIN), College of Forest Resources (FOR), College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS), College of Management (MGT), College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (PAMS), and College of Textiles (TEX). This section provides responses to selected questions by Transfer students in the nine areas in which survey responses were available. Section II (Transfer Student Issues) and Section III (Marketing Research) also report responses by academic unit.

The percentage of respondents in each academic unit who indicated they were able to apply for university, college, or department scholarships is presented in Chart 7. The breakdown of Transfer students' employment plans during the academic year, by academic unit, is shown in Chart 8.


College of Agriculture and Life Sciences - Bachelor's (CALS)


School of Design (DSGN)


College of Education and Psychology (ED/PSY)


College of Engineering (ENGIN)


College of Forest Resources (FOR)


College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS)


College of Management (MGT)


College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (PAMS)


College of Textiles (TEX)

Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page


SECTION XI

COMPARISON OF 1995 FIRST-YEAR AND TRANSFER RESPONDENTS

This section presents a comparison of selected questions from the First-Year student survey (N=2,788) and the Transfer student survey (N=670). Demographic comparisons (using Chi-square analysis) are presented in Tables 42 through 47, followed by comparisons of First-Year and Transfer student responses to like questions. Tests of significance on these questions were performed using Chi-square analysis for frequency data and t-tests for means.

There were no significant differences between the two groups by gender. However, significant differences by ethnicity, academic unit, enrollment status, marital status, and number of dependent children were found. The First-Year student group had a higher percentage of minority students than did the Transfer group. More students transferred into the College of Humanities and Social Sciences and the College of Management than entered as beginning students. Transfer students were more likely to enroll part-time, to be married, and to have dependent children.

Table 42: Gender Comparison
Gender
First-Year
Transfer
Female
1,189
42.7%
278
41.5%
Male
1,599
57.3%
392
58.5%


Table 43: Ethnicity Comparison
Ethnic Group
First-Year
Transfer
White
2,259
81.0%
579
86.4%
African-American
352
12.6%
31
4.6%
Other Minorities
177
6.4%
60
9.0%
p<0.001

Table 44: Enrollment Status Comparison
Enrollment Status
First-Year
Transfer
Part-Time (<12 hours)
16
0.6%
71
10.6%
Full-Time (12 or more hours)
2,772
99.4%
597
89.4%
p<0.001

Table 45: Marital Status Comparison
Marital Status
First-Year
Transfer
Married
4
0.1%
100
14.9%
Single
2,784
99.9%
570
85.1%
p<0.001

Table 46: Academic Unit Comparison
Academic Unit
First-Year
Transfer
Agriculture and Life Sciences (Bachelor's)
570
20.4%
165
24.6%
Design
45
1.6%
10
1.5%
Education and Psychology
84
3.0%
30
4.5%
Engineering
790
28.3%
130
19.4%
Forest Resources
90
3.2%
46
6.9%
Humanities and Social Sciences
242
8.7%
123
18.4%
Management
192
6.9%
120
17.9%
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
114
4.1%
32
4.8%
Textiles
105
3.8%
14
2.1%
First-Year College
506
18.1%
0
0.0%
Subtotal
2,738
98.1%
670
100.0%
Agricultural Institute (Two-Year)
50
1.8%
0
0.0%
Total
2,788
100.0%
670
100.0%
p<0.001
NOTE: Textile Engineering Undesignated is included in the College of Engineering for enrollment and in the College of Textiles for statistics.

Table 47: Number of Dependent Children
Number of dependent children (%)
First-Year
Transfer
None
97.5
89.8
1
0.9
4.9
2
1.0
3.8
3 or more
0.5
1.6
p<0.001

Factors Influencing Attendance Decision

Respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which any of seventeen listed factors influenced their decision to attend/transfer to NC State. The scale used was: 5 = Very Strong Influence, 4 = Strong Influence, 3 = Moderate Influence, 2 = Weak Influence, and 1 = Very Weak Influence. The means and standard deviations for each factor, ranked from highest to lowest means for the total group, are listed in Table 48. The percentage choosing each factor as the single most influential in their decision is also given.

In order of preference, First-Year students were more influenced by academic reputation, availability of program, and facilities/resources available, while Transfer students were more influenced by availability of program, location, and academic reputation. Significant differences between the two groups were found for over half of the factors. For instance, First-Year students were significantly (p<0.001) more influenced by academic reputation, size, level of support for my intended major, facilities/resources available, and extracurricular opportunities than were Transfer students. The two groups also differed significantly (p<0.001) on choice of the single most influential factor.

Table 48: Factors Influencing Decision to Attend/Transfer to NC State

Factors
Mean and Standard Deviation
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Most Influential Factor
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Academic reputation
4.05***
3.88
23.8%
20.5%
0.83
0.89
Cost
3.32
3.32
6.5%
6.8%
1.21
1.18
Location
3.61
3.93***
10.6%
22.1%
1.10
1.09
Size
2.87***
2.63
0.9%
0.9%
1.11
1.11
Availability of program
3.92
4.00
18.4%
25.3%
1.05
1.00
Recommended by a friend, family member, teacher, counselor, etc.
3.31*

3.17

5.6%

2.7%
1.22
1.27
Number of hours transferred/credited
2.34
2.84***
0.3%
1.1%
1.07
1.20
Level of support for my intended major
3.82***
3.67
13.6%
8.8%
1.07
1.10
Facilities and resources available
3.89***
3.63
5.1%
2.7%
0.95
1.04
Scholarships/financial aid available
2.88*
2.73
4.1%
1.4%
1.32
1.25
Campus visit prior to orientation
3.11***
2.71
3.1%
1.1%
1.67
1.27
Contact with a school official
2.44
2.61**
0.7%
0.6%
1.18
1.16
Contact with a current student
3.10
2.99
2.4%
2.1%
1.22
1.26
Attendance at a College Fair
2.26***
2.00
0.2%
0.2%
1.13
0.98
Publications from NC State
2.48
2.40
0.3%
0.5%
1.11
1.15
Extracurricular opportunities
2.93***
2.70
1.1%
0.8%
1.17
1.20
Other
4.24
3.96
3.2%
2.6%
1.23
1.40
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Educational Intent

The data in Table 49 reveal that Transfer students were significantly (p<0.001) more sure (certain or very certain) of their major (91%) than were First-Year students (73%).

Over half (54%) of First-Year students reported that their primary goal or objective for attending NC State was to obtain a bachelor's degree as preparation for further schooling, and one-third (32%) stated that their primary goal was to obtain a bachelor's degree as preparation for a career (see Table 50). Transfer students were more closely split between these two goals/objectives; 47% gave further schooling as the primary goal and 40% indicated career preparation as their primary objective. These differences were significant at p< 0.01.

Significant differences (p<0.001) were also found between the two groups on their educational aspirations (see Table 51). More Transfer students (34%) plan to stop with a bachelor's degree than do First-Year students (28%).

Table 49: Certainty of College Major
Certainty of college major (%)
First-Year
Transfer
Very uncertain
4.6
1.4
Uncertain
22.8
8.0
Certain
44.2
41.0
Very certain
28.5
49.7
p<0.001

Table 50: Primary Goal/Objective for Attending
Primary goal or objective for attending NC State (%)
First-Year

Transfer
Bachelor's degree or certificate only
9.6
9.9
Bachelor's degree as preparation for school
53.7
46.7
Bachelor's degree as preparation for career
32.1
39.8
Improve for current profession
2.1
1.7
Courses for personal interest
0.6
0.5
Other
1.9
1.5
p<0.01


Table 51: Highest Level of Education Planned

Highest level of education plan to complete (%)

First-Year

Transfer
Certificate
1.5
0.0
Bachelor's degree
28.2
34.1
Master's degree
38.3
40.5
Doctoral degree
17.2
14.2
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine
6.3
5.1
Other professional degree
8.6
5.7
Do not intend to complete a degree
0.0
0.3
p<0.001

Goals for Undergraduate Preparation

This section provides students' ratings of twelve goals for general education specified by NC State, sixteen goals related to student personal development, and seven goals related to student world view. Respondents were asked their current level of development in these goals as well as the importance of each goal to them at the time of the survey. Tables 52 through 54 present the means and standard deviations for First-Year and Transfer respondents on each of the three goal areas. The rating scale used for level of development was: 5 = Very High, 4 = High, 3 = Average, 2 = Low, and 1 = Very Low. The rating scale used for importance was: 5 = Very Important, 4 = Important, 3 = Moderately Important, 2 = Of Limited Importance, and 1 = Not Important.

General Education

For the general education goals, significant differences on current level of development were found for over half of the goals. Specifically, Transfer students rated their development on developing good reading comprehension skills; ability to critically analyze events, information and ideas; and ability to plan and carry out projects independently higher than did First-Year students.

Significant differences between these two groups were found on the importance ratings of all the general development goals. In general, First-Year students rated the importance of math and scientific-related skills as more important than did Transfer students, while the reverse was true for most general education and humanities-related skills.

Interestingly, Transfer students rated their level of development on understanding diverse cultures and values higher than did First-Year students, but rated the importance of this goal lower than did First-Year students.

Table 52: General Education Goals
Mean and Standard Deviation
Development
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Importance
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Acquiring a broad general education
3.80*
0.78
3.72
0.75
3.99
0.96
4.13***
0.99
Ability to communicate ideas in writing
3.38
0.89
3.52***
0.89
4.46***
0.75
4.20
0.90
Ability to communicate ideas orally
3.39
0.93
3.43
0.93
4.09
0.87
4.41***
0.80
Developing good listening skills
3.69
0.83
3.75
0.81
4.33
0.80
4.41*
0.80
Developing good reading comprehension skills
3.39
0.91
3.63***
0.88
3.73
1.14
4.37***
0.81
Ability to apply mathematics skills
3.68***
0.92
3.53
0.94
4.64***
0.66
4.21
0.93
Understanding how science and technology influence everyday life
3.60
0.87

3.62
0.89

4.34***
0.83

4.09
0.95
Ability to apply scientific principles
3.36
0.88
3.32
0.94
4.25***
0.89
3.96
1.04

Developing computer skills
3.20
1.01
3.15
1.00
4.34
0.79
4.43*
0.79
Ability to critically analyze events, information and ideas
3.49
0.80

3.67***
0.82

4.39***
0.80

4.22
0.84
Ability to plan and carry out projects independently
3.67
0.85
3.80***
0.80
3.87
0.98
4.45***
0.72
Understanding diverse cultures and values
3.26
0.99
3.52***
0.90
4.44***
0.75
3.84
1.06
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Personal Development

Significant differences were found on current level of development for over half of the personal development goals, with Transfer students rating eight of those nine goals higher than did First-Year students. In particular, Transfer students rated their development on taking responsibility for my own behavior and viewing learning as a lifelong process higher than did First-Year students, although both groups rated these goals as their two highest in development.

On the importance of personal development goals, significant differences were found for all goals except one. Transfer students appeared to rate most self-concept issues as much more important that did First-Year students. Moreover, self-concept issues were rated higher in importance than most other personal development goals by Transfer students, in contrast to First-Year students.

Table 53: Personal Development Goals
Mean and Standard Deviation
Development
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Importance
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Taking responsibility for my own behavior
4.30
0.74
4.47***
0.67
4.36
0.83
4.62***
0.70
Viewing learning as a lifelong process
4.06
0.83
4.27***
0.78
4.61***
0.67
4.43
0.81
Recognizing and acting upon ethical principles
3.82
0.88
4.03***
0.75
4.45***
0.75
4.34
0.80
Improving leadership and management skills
3.52
0.87
3.64**
0.86
4.29
0.86
4.39**
0.80
Ability to function as part of a team
3.93
0.86
3.94
0.84
4.28
0.83
4.37**
0.80
Being involved with public and community affairs
3.18**
1.00
3.04
0.98
4.55***
0.71
3.80
0.97
Understanding my own abilities and interests
3.87
0.83
3.91
0.80
4.48*
0.75
4.40
0.76
Developing a commitment to personal health and fitness
3.61
0.98

3.61
1.00

4.60***
0.67

4.31
0.86

Having self-confidence
3.68
0.96
3.67
0.94
4.60
0.68
4.55
0.69
Realizing my potential for success
3.74
0.88
3.76
0.85
3.34
0.84
4.51***
0.72

Clarifying personal identity
3.73
0.88
3.81*
0.83
3.26
0.88
4.26***
0.88

Coping with change
3.63
0.91
3.73*
0.91
3.71
0.92
4.24***
0.86
Being independent and self-reliant
3.97
0.85
4.07**
0.85
3.32
1.10
4.51***
0.73

Handling stress
3.49
0.94
3.52
0.96
3.70
0.92
4.50***
0.73

Managing my time
3.32
0.99
3.47***
0.92
4.07
0.90
4.57***
0.69

Having self-discipline
3.80
0.95
3.79
0.89
4.04
0.96
4.59***
0.68
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

World View

First-Year students rated their current level of development on six of the seven world view goals significantly higher than did Transfer students. However, the top two levels of development for Transfer students were valuing racial equity and valuing gender equity, which were not the top areas for First-Year students.

Significant differences in importance were found for only three goals, with First-Year students rating all three significantly higher than did Transfer students. The most interesting finding was that First-Year students felt having a tolerance for different points of view was more important than did Transfer students.

Table 54: World View Goals
Mean and Standard Deviation
Development
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Importance
FIRST-YEAR TRANSFER
Understanding issues and problems facing the world
4.43***
0.79
3.44
0.83
4.10
0.89
4.09
0.84
Understanding the present as it relates to historical events/processes
4.10***
0.91

3.39
0.85

3.80
0.98

3.88
0.94
Being able to interact and work with people from diverse backgrounds
4.34***
0.80

3.78
0.84

4.28*
0.88

4.19
0.89
Advancing my appreciation of the arts, music and literature
4.36***
0.81

3.37
0.99

3.69
1.14

3.72
1.10
Having a tolerance for different points of view
4.24***
0.83
3.72
0.85
4.31**
0.85
4.19
0.92

Valuing gender equity
4.32***
0.84
4.08
0.87
4.34*
0.93
4.25
0.92

Valuing racial equity
4.11
0.93
4.09
0.90
4.34
0.96
4.27
0.96
***p< 0.001 **p< 0.01 *p< 0.05

Summary

An interesting aspect of the findings on general education goals is that the skills rated differently by Transfer students tend to be more job-related or more often associated with what could reasonably be expected from more mature students. The maturity level of Transfer students was also apparent in the other goal areas. Transfer students appeared to have a more practical assessment of the importance of self-concept and a more realistic self-assessment of their development on diversity issues.

Background Information

Almost one-third of both First-Year and Transfer respondents indicated that they will be receiving need-based financial aid (see Table 55). Significantly more First-Year students than Transfer students will be receiving academic aid (25% vs. 7%, p< 0.001).

Table 55: Financial Aid
Financial aid receiving (%)
First-Year
Transfer
Financial need
31.9
32.8
Other
10.5
11.8
Academic ***
25.2
6.7
Athletic-based **
2.4
0.6
*** p< 0.001 ** p< 0.01

Students were asked three questions about their parents/guardians. A significant difference (p<0.01) in parent/guardian income was found, with First-Year students generally reporting a higher parent/guardian income than did Transfer students (see Table 56). It should be noted that only slightly over half of the Transfer students responded to this question, and the remainder responded to the question concerning independent student income.

Table 56: Parent/Guardian Income
Parent/Guardian income (%)
First-Year
Transfer
$10,000 or less
1.5
2.8
$10,001 - $20,000
5.2
6.5
$20,001 - $30,000
9.4
12.8
$30,001 - $40,000
12.7
13.8
$40,001 - $50,000
12.1
13.6
$50,001 - $60,000
16.6
10.8
$60,001 - $75,000
15.5
15.8
$75,001 - $100,000
13.7
13.3
More than $100,000
13.2
10.6
p<0.01

Tables 57 and 58 report education levels for father/male guardian and mother/female guardian. A significant difference (p<0.001) in parent/guardian education was found, with more First-Year students than Transfer students reporting both parents/guardians with at least some college.

Table 57: Father/Male Guardian Education
Father/Male Guardian education (%)
First-Year
Transfer
Eighth grade or less
0.6
2.6
Some high school
2.7
4.1
High school graduate
22.0
27.7
1-2 yrs college
18.4
24.7
3-4 yrs college
34.6
25.1
5-6 yrs college
13.3
9.3
>6 yrs college
8.4
6.5
p<0.001

Table 58: Mother/Female Guardian Education
Mother/Female Guardian education (%)
First-Year
Transfer
Eighth grade or less
0.4
1.7
Some high school
1.5
4.0
High school graduate
26.5
34.1
1-2 yrs college
25.4
29.7
3-4 yrs college
31.4
22.1
5-6 yrs college
12.0
7.0
>6 yrs college
2.7
1.4
p<0.001

Significant differences (p<0.001) between the two groups of respondents were found on two employment plans questions. Over half (59%) of First-Year students do not plan to work during their first academic year, whereas only slightly more than one-fourth (27%) of Transfer students will not work (see Table 59). Many more Transfer students (26%) than First-Year students (5%) plan to work 20 or more hours per week, an expected finding since more Transfer students are enrolled part-time. As revealed in Table 60, First-Year students are more likely than Transfer students to plan on not restricting their job search to North Carolina after graduation.


Table 59: Employment Plans During Academic Year
Employment during academic year (%)
First-Year
Transfer
20 or more hrs/wk
5.1
26.2
11-19 hrs/wk
13.2
24.5
1-10 hrs/wk
22.9
22.3
Do not plan to work
58.8
27.0
p<0.001

Table 60: Employment After Graduation
Where plan to seek employment after graduation (%)
First-Year

Transfer
In North Carolina
43.1
49.1
Outside NC but in USA
13.1
11.7
Outside the USA
1.6
1.4
Anywhere
40.3
33.8
Will not seek employment
2.0
3.9
p<0.001


Return to Table of Contents
Return to UPA Survey Page
Return to UPA Home Page