ClassEval, Spring 2008, Overall Report
Statistics for all responses for each question by level of course
 
Each question was rated on a scale of 5 = Strongly Agree to 1 = Strongly Disagree.

  Level of Courses
Undergraduate Graduate
Response N Mean Std Dev Std Error Mean Response N Mean Std Dev Std Error Mean
University Total 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 61,823 4.421 0.751 0.003 7,356 4.467 0.702 0.008
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 59,853 4.306 0.886 0.004 7,182 4.430 0.814 0.010
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 61,266 4.092 1.057 0.004 7,297 4.190 0.958 0.011
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 61,636 4.424 0.836 0.003 7,338 4.496 0.776 0.009
5. The instructor was prepared for class 61,421 4.454 0.765 0.003 7,320 4.468 0.795 0.009
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 61,153 4.247 0.959 0.004 7,297 4.249 0.961 0.011
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 59,082 4.298 0.883 0.004 6,953 4.291 0.887 0.011
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 61,614 4.465 0.787 0.003 7,340 4.563 0.734 0.009
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 61,642 4.236 1.014 0.004 7,333 4.316 0.926 0.011
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 58,989 4.099 1.018 0.004 7,102 4.214 0.933 0.011
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 60,298 4.209 0.943 0.004 7,255 4.309 0.893 0.010
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 61,370 4.245 0.938 0.004 7,345 4.332 0.908 0.011
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 61,542 4.311 0.916 0.004 7,345 4.447 0.806 0.009
14. Overall, this course was excellent 61,519 4.058 1.098 0.004 7,322 4.209 0.993 0.012
Vice Chancellor-Provost 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 32 4.344 0.745 0.132 . . . .
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 29 4.103 1.047 0.194 . . . .
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 32 3.750 0.950 0.168 . . . .
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 32 4.219 0.706 0.125 . . . .
5. The instructor was prepared for class 31 4.419 0.620 0.111 . . . .
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 30 3.933 1.143 0.209 . . . .
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 32 4.406 0.665 0.118 . . . .
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 32 4.406 0.837 0.148 . . . .
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 32 3.938 1.105 0.195 . . . .
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 29 3.414 1.296 0.241 . . . .
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 32 3.844 1.051 0.186 . . . .
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 32 3.906 0.928 0.164 . . . .
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 32 4.156 1.081 0.191 . . . .
14. Overall, this course was excellent 32 3.938 1.045 0.185 . . . .
Student Affairs 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 4,106 4.595 0.615 0.010 . . . .
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 3,874 4.417 0.813 0.013 . . . .
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 3,956 4.419 0.765 0.012 . . . .
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 4,082 4.647 0.632 0.010 . . . .
5. The instructor was prepared for class 4,079 4.621 0.618 0.010 . . . .
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 4,010 4.504 0.739 0.012 . . . .
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 3,446 4.424 0.799 0.014 . . . .
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 4,081 4.583 0.701 0.011 . . . .
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 4,078 4.580 0.681 0.011 . . . .
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 3,599 4.263 0.955 0.016 . . . .
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 3,554 4.346 0.867 0.015 . . . .
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 3,836 4.231 0.970 0.016 . . . .
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 4,043 4.485 0.756 0.012 . . . .
14. Overall, this course was excellent 4,069 4.486 0.782 0.012 . . . .
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 8,443 4.479 0.705 0.008 829 4.481 0.685 0.024
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 8,244 4.381 0.828 0.009 798 4.469 0.718 0.025
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 8,404 4.171 1.009 0.011 824 4.251 0.847 0.030
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 8,419 4.480 0.776 0.008 827 4.519 0.698 0.024
5. The instructor was prepared for class 8,407 4.483 0.733 0.008 822 4.465 0.776 0.027
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 8,385 4.323 0.893 0.010 811 4.339 0.865 0.030
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 8,363 4.404 0.792 0.009 814 4.370 0.827 0.029
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 8,414 4.487 0.778 0.008 826 4.579 0.685 0.024
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 8,418 4.299 0.956 0.010 826 4.380 0.811 0.028
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 8,080 4.179 0.965 0.011 784 4.295 0.806 0.029
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 8,202 4.221 0.944 0.010 791 4.364 0.776 0.028
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 8,421 4.295 0.897 0.010 828 4.418 0.774 0.027
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 8,413 4.355 0.886 0.010 831 4.539 0.654 0.023
14. Overall, this course was excellent 8,406 4.134 1.060 0.012 829 4.315 0.856 0.030
College of Design 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 755 4.419 0.744 0.027 225 4.462 0.861 0.057
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 732 4.355 0.870 0.032 214 4.495 0.809 0.055
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 746 4.241 0.887 0.032 220 4.191 1.073 0.072
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 753 4.519 0.794 0.029 225 4.631 0.663 0.044
5. The instructor was prepared for class 746 4.513 0.751 0.028 225 4.507 0.797 0.053
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 742 4.264 0.948 0.035 223 4.359 0.976 0.065
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 715 4.406 0.815 0.030 203 4.286 0.963 0.068
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 753 4.466 0.826 0.030 224 4.558 0.856 0.057
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 751 4.386 0.885 0.032 225 4.436 0.971 0.065
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 617 4.147 0.929 0.037 177 4.209 1.042 0.078
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 744 4.331 0.864 0.032 215 4.367 0.981 0.067
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 752 4.394 0.857 0.031 225 4.458 0.925 0.062
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 750 4.469 0.801 0.029 225 4.538 0.906 0.060
14. Overall, this course was excellent 754 4.244 0.984 0.036 224 4.348 1.026 0.069
College of Education 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 1,545 4.447 0.762 0.019 955 4.574 0.666 0.022
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 1,524 4.406 0.863 0.022 935 4.466 0.841 0.028
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 1,500 4.223 0.976 0.025 940 4.234 1.001 0.033
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 1,539 4.505 0.768 0.020 951 4.535 0.780 0.025
5. The instructor was prepared for class 1,533 4.448 0.806 0.021 944 4.419 0.924 0.030
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 1,534 4.256 1.004 0.026 948 4.201 1.070 0.035
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 1,496 4.388 0.839 0.022 917 4.312 0.955 0.032
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 1,541 4.502 0.768 0.020 950 4.579 0.787 0.026
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 1,536 4.324 0.950 0.024 950 4.337 0.984 0.032
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 1,475 4.125 1.029 0.027 944 4.313 0.922 0.030
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 1,526 4.221 0.974 0.025 947 4.326 0.921 0.030
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 1,525 4.097 1.085 0.028 951 4.352 0.961 0.031
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 1,530 4.318 0.919 0.023 949 4.437 0.892 0.029
14. Overall, this course was excellent 1,535 4.123 1.073 0.027 948 4.211 1.083 0.035
College of Engineering 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 6,792 4.261 0.814 0.010 1,636 4.355 0.717 0.018
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 6,542 4.126 0.961 0.012 1,610 4.301 0.877 0.022
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 6,728 3.802 1.160 0.014 1,631 4.039 0.996 0.025
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 6,757 4.206 0.931 0.011 1,634 4.358 0.862 0.021
5. The instructor was prepared for class 6,746 4.275 0.860 0.010 1,632 4.369 0.829 0.021
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 6,682 4.002 1.054 0.013 1,628 4.085 1.014 0.025
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 6,542 4.138 0.918 0.011 1,607 4.238 0.861 0.021
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 6,755 4.300 0.856 0.010 1,635 4.462 0.766 0.019
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 6,764 3.970 1.122 0.014 1,636 4.163 0.975 0.024
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 6,412 3.824 1.111 0.014 1,598 4.103 0.958 0.024
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 6,699 4.125 0.966 0.012 1,630 4.233 0.919 0.023
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 6,777 4.174 0.951 0.012 1,636 4.251 0.938 0.023
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 6,765 4.212 0.937 0.011 1,634 4.344 0.855 0.021
14. Overall, this course was excellent 6,765 3.814 1.159 0.014 1,629 4.103 1.025 0.025
College of Natural Resoures 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 1,280 4.470 0.685 0.019 198 4.338 0.782 0.056
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 1,264 4.407 0.803 0.023 198 4.505 0.666 0.047
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 1,265 4.258 0.894 0.025 197 4.152 0.951 0.068
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 1,274 4.491 0.747 0.021 199 4.533 0.665 0.047
5. The instructor was prepared for class 1,269 4.467 0.730 0.020 199 4.397 0.834 0.059
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 1,269 4.314 0.894 0.025 197 4.264 0.893 0.064
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 1,258 4.441 0.742 0.021 196 4.367 0.802 0.057
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 1,268 4.540 0.706 0.020 198 4.581 0.720 0.051
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 1,272 4.347 0.866 0.024 199 4.302 0.943 0.067
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 1,244 4.173 0.956 0.027 197 4.274 0.896 0.064
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 1,270 4.275 0.911 0.026 200 4.315 0.872 0.062
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 1,274 4.280 0.885 0.025 200 4.280 0.914 0.065
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 1,271 4.400 0.823 0.023 201 4.423 0.797 0.056
14. Overall, this course was excellent 1,274 4.206 0.974 0.027 200 4.255 0.982 0.069
College of Humanities and Social Sciences 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 18,501 4.465 0.731 0.005 802 4.545 0.680 0.024
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 17,995 4.370 0.851 0.006 793 4.536 0.800 0.028
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 18,348 4.199 0.988 0.007 796 4.347 0.907 0.032
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 18,434 4.514 0.772 0.006 799 4.587 0.711 0.025
5. The instructor was prepared for class 18,332 4.500 0.741 0.005 798 4.561 0.732 0.026
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 18,349 4.295 0.951 0.007 796 4.329 0.969 0.034
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 17,719 4.309 0.896 0.007 688 4.310 0.886 0.034
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 18,432 4.518 0.762 0.006 800 4.639 0.739 0.026
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 18,442 4.324 0.964 0.007 797 4.458 0.871 0.031
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 18,313 4.208 0.970 0.007 790 4.353 0.859 0.031
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 18,198 4.236 0.932 0.007 799 4.397 0.850 0.030
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 18,436 4.286 0.928 0.007 800 4.411 0.917 0.032
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 18,429 4.369 0.892 0.007 802 4.564 0.749 0.026
14. Overall, this course was excellent 18,386 4.143 1.068 0.008 796 4.274 0.995 0.035
College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 12,300 4.347 0.796 0.007 1,101 4.516 0.663 0.020
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 11,853 4.207 0.935 0.009 1,062 4.537 0.734 0.023
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 12,286 3.923 1.170 0.011 1,095 4.236 0.935 0.028
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 12,293 4.288 0.935 0.008 1,098 4.550 0.734 0.022
5. The instructor was prepared for class 12,256 4.391 0.810 0.007 1,100 4.608 0.673 0.020
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 12,176 4.170 0.990 0.009 1,094 4.413 0.801 0.024
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 11,646 4.200 0.943 0.009 972 4.359 0.890 0.029
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 12,285 4.402 0.824 0.007 1,101 4.658 0.619 0.019
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 12,303 4.090 1.109 0.010 1,102 4.397 0.857 0.026
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 11,458 3.975 1.052 0.010 1,055 4.166 0.990 0.030
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 12,170 4.182 0.943 0.009 1,088 4.418 0.810 0.025
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 12,282 4.256 0.910 0.008 1,099 4.429 0.792 0.024
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 12,282 4.209 0.979 0.009 1,100 4.517 0.734 0.022
14. Overall, this course was excellent 12,274 3.888 1.162 0.010 1,098 4.286 0.910 0.027
College of Textiles 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 1,460 4.399 0.756 0.020 104 4.375 0.815 0.080
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 1,435 4.285 0.920 0.024 104 4.337 0.877 0.086
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 1,452 4.092 1.023 0.027 104 4.048 1.037 0.102
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 1,462 4.400 0.839 0.022 104 4.529 0.710 0.070
5. The instructor was prepared for class 1,457 4.449 0.754 0.020 104 4.346 0.810 0.079
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 1,450 4.194 0.979 0.026 104 4.231 0.968 0.095
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 1,440 4.416 0.784 0.021 103 4.350 0.789 0.078
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 1,460 4.440 0.819 0.021 104 4.615 0.673 0.066
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 1,460 4.168 1.048 0.027 104 4.135 0.956 0.094
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 1,364 4.012 1.051 0.028 94 4.266 0.819 0.084
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 1,453 4.182 0.937 0.025 104 4.317 0.754 0.074
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 1,456 4.166 0.980 0.026 104 4.192 0.976 0.096
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 1,452 4.271 0.908 0.024 104 4.308 0.882 0.087
14. Overall, this course was excellent 1,450 3.974 1.118 0.029 102 4.029 1.057 0.105
College of Veterinary Medicine 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes . . . . 59 4.593 0.529 0.069
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom . . . . 54 4.537 0.665 0.090
3. The instructor explained difficult material well . . . . 48 4.563 0.501 0.072
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course . . . . 55 4.382 0.850 0.115
5. The instructor was prepared for class . . . . 51 4.627 0.564 0.079
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback . . . . 55 4.436 0.660 0.089
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology . . . . 51 4.431 0.700 0.098
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect . . . . 58 4.655 0.608 0.080
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher . . . . 51 4.608 0.635 0.089
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning . . . . 57 4.298 0.844 0.112
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning . . . . 48 4.229 0.928 0.134
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating . . . . 58 4.466 0.777 0.102
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject . . . . 58 4.603 0.699 0.092
14. Overall, this course was excellent . . . . 58 4.379 0.834 0.110
College of Management 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 5,791 4.376 0.769 0.010 1,447 4.454 0.696 0.018
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 5,550 4.227 0.910 0.012 1,414 4.373 0.833 0.022
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 5,758 3.962 1.096 0.014 1,442 4.177 0.955 0.025
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 5,774 4.361 0.866 0.011 1,446 4.498 0.790 0.021
5. The instructor was prepared for class 5,748 4.454 0.733 0.010 1,445 4.461 0.776 0.020
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 5,715 4.200 0.964 0.013 1,441 4.223 0.969 0.026
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 5,621 4.282 0.899 0.012 1,402 4.215 0.906 0.024
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 5,774 4.456 0.764 0.010 1,444 4.535 0.743 0.020
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 5,768 4.140 1.060 0.014 1,443 4.283 0.944 0.025
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 5,619 4.070 1.017 0.014 1,406 4.173 0.956 0.025
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 5,639 4.152 0.978 0.013 1,433 4.215 0.969 0.026
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 5,766 4.184 0.969 0.013 1,444 4.234 0.965 0.025
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 5,763 4.247 0.962 0.013 1,441 4.393 0.813 0.021
14. Overall, this course was excellent 5,757 3.957 1.130 0.015 1,438 4.150 1.010 0.027
Division of Undergraduate Academic Programs 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes 818 4.604 0.635 0.022 . . . .
2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom 811 4.681 0.588 0.021 . . . .
3. The instructor explained difficult material well 791 4.503 0.697 0.025 . . . .
4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course 817 4.698 0.549 0.019 . . . .
5. The instructor was prepared for class 817 4.652 0.608 0.021 . . . .
6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback 811 4.560 0.735 0.026 . . . .
7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology 804 4.539 0.688 0.024 . . . .
8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect 819 4.725 0.563 0.020 . . . .
9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher 818 4.603 0.703 0.025 . . . .
10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning 779 4.182 1.019 0.037 . . . .
11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning 811 4.206 0.994 0.035 . . . .
12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating 813 3.993 1.127 0.040 . . . .
13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject 812 4.256 0.966 0.034 . . . .
14. Overall, this course was excellent 817 4.159 1.049 0.037 . . . .