| ClassEval, Fall 2007, Overall Report |
| Statistics for all responses for each question by level of course |
| Each question was rated on a scale of 5 = Strongly Agree to 1 = Strongly Disagree. |
| Level of Courses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate | Graduate | ||||||||
| Response N | Mean | Std Dev | Std Error Mean | Response N | Mean | Std Dev | Std Error Mean | ||
| University Total | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 64,716 | 4.411 | 0.752 | 0.003 | 18,399 | 4.351 | 0.787 | 0.006 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 62,526 | 4.283 | 0.901 | 0.004 | 17,876 | 4.274 | 0.906 | 0.007 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 64,099 | 4.056 | 1.077 | 0.004 | 18,313 | 4.014 | 1.089 | 0.008 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 64,473 | 4.406 | 0.855 | 0.003 | 18,345 | 4.345 | 0.886 | 0.007 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 64,400 | 4.453 | 0.767 | 0.003 | 18,281 | 4.371 | 0.833 | 0.006 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 64,080 | 4.225 | 0.969 | 0.004 | 18,231 | 4.162 | 1.005 | 0.007 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 61,817 | 4.272 | 0.905 | 0.004 | 17,707 | 4.251 | 0.911 | 0.007 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 64,473 | 4.461 | 0.796 | 0.003 | 18,295 | 4.423 | 0.817 | 0.006 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 64,493 | 4.212 | 1.028 | 0.004 | 18,339 | 4.159 | 1.042 | 0.008 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 61,747 | 4.068 | 1.031 | 0.004 | 17,630 | 4.077 | 1.013 | 0.008 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 63,241 | 4.186 | 0.954 | 0.004 | 18,075 | 4.188 | 0.944 | 0.007 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 64,220 | 4.208 | 0.966 | 0.004 | 18,332 | 4.232 | 0.936 | 0.007 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 64,424 | 4.283 | 0.933 | 0.004 | 18,359 | 4.282 | 0.915 | 0.007 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 64,391 | 4.022 | 1.117 | 0.004 | 18,330 | 4.006 | 1.107 | 0.008 | |
| Vice Chancellor-Provost | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 66 | 4.788 | 0.412 | 0.051 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 64 | 4.625 | 0.787 | 0.098 | 8 | 4.875 | 0.354 | 0.125 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 65 | 4.600 | 0.825 | 0.102 | 8 | 4.625 | 0.518 | 0.183 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 65 | 4.662 | 0.594 | 0.074 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 65 | 4.754 | 0.560 | 0.069 | 8 | 4.625 | 0.518 | 0.183 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 65 | 4.538 | 0.867 | 0.108 | 8 | 4.625 | 0.518 | 0.183 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 65 | 4.723 | 0.484 | 0.060 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 65 | 4.708 | 0.631 | 0.078 | 8 | 4.875 | 0.354 | 0.125 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 65 | 4.708 | 0.701 | 0.087 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 65 | 4.600 | 0.703 | 0.087 | 8 | 4.375 | 0.744 | 0.263 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 65 | 4.631 | 0.821 | 0.102 | 8 | 4.875 | 0.354 | 0.125 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 65 | 4.631 | 0.698 | 0.087 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 65 | 4.754 | 0.613 | 0.076 | 8 | 4.750 | 0.463 | 0.164 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 65 | 4.646 | 0.738 | 0.092 | 8 | 4.875 | 0.354 | 0.125 | |
| Student Affairs | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 3,888 | 4.624 | 0.590 | 0.009 | 264 | 4.470 | 0.702 | 0.043 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 3,614 | 4.436 | 0.795 | 0.013 | 259 | 4.351 | 0.904 | 0.056 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 3,759 | 4.447 | 0.757 | 0.012 | 255 | 4.200 | 0.982 | 0.061 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 3,869 | 4.694 | 0.573 | 0.009 | 261 | 4.529 | 0.715 | 0.044 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 3,872 | 4.666 | 0.571 | 0.009 | 256 | 4.480 | 0.703 | 0.044 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 3,817 | 4.545 | 0.697 | 0.011 | 260 | 4.346 | 0.885 | 0.055 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 3,217 | 4.426 | 0.786 | 0.014 | 257 | 4.405 | 0.775 | 0.048 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 3,883 | 4.613 | 0.669 | 0.011 | 261 | 4.414 | 0.889 | 0.055 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 3,874 | 4.608 | 0.660 | 0.011 | 261 | 4.318 | 0.874 | 0.054 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 3,363 | 4.242 | 0.960 | 0.017 | 256 | 4.105 | 1.022 | 0.064 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 3,358 | 4.358 | 0.835 | 0.014 | 254 | 4.248 | 0.874 | 0.055 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 3,625 | 4.227 | 0.945 | 0.016 | 255 | 4.102 | 0.995 | 0.062 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 3,838 | 4.507 | 0.733 | 0.012 | 261 | 4.349 | 0.826 | 0.051 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 3,873 | 4.533 | 0.746 | 0.012 | 263 | 4.217 | 0.990 | 0.061 | |
| College of Agriculture and Life Sciences | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 9,358 | 4.450 | 0.734 | 0.008 | 3,565 | 4.409 | 0.743 | 0.012 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 9,099 | 4.332 | 0.889 | 0.009 | 3,492 | 4.316 | 0.877 | 0.015 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 9,313 | 4.141 | 1.039 | 0.011 | 3,558 | 4.067 | 1.055 | 0.018 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 9,342 | 4.447 | 0.836 | 0.009 | 3,558 | 4.394 | 0.844 | 0.014 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 9,339 | 4.480 | 0.753 | 0.008 | 3,542 | 4.383 | 0.839 | 0.014 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 9,287 | 4.281 | 0.949 | 0.010 | 3,543 | 4.205 | 0.991 | 0.017 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 9,280 | 4.382 | 0.844 | 0.009 | 3,532 | 4.359 | 0.878 | 0.015 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 9,335 | 4.473 | 0.810 | 0.008 | 3,549 | 4.449 | 0.815 | 0.014 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 9,327 | 4.275 | 0.999 | 0.010 | 3,549 | 4.216 | 1.000 | 0.017 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 9,009 | 4.165 | 0.993 | 0.010 | 3,415 | 4.118 | 0.976 | 0.017 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 9,097 | 4.186 | 0.983 | 0.010 | 3,476 | 4.182 | 0.945 | 0.016 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 9,324 | 4.246 | 0.979 | 0.010 | 3,549 | 4.221 | 0.927 | 0.016 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 9,330 | 4.320 | 0.936 | 0.010 | 3,553 | 4.289 | 0.915 | 0.015 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 9,291 | 4.085 | 1.119 | 0.012 | 3,546 | 4.048 | 1.083 | 0.018 | |
| College of Design | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 970 | 4.281 | 0.874 | 0.028 | 198 | 4.449 | 0.723 | 0.051 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 942 | 4.242 | 1.013 | 0.033 | 192 | 4.484 | 0.786 | 0.057 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 963 | 4.039 | 1.100 | 0.035 | 198 | 4.187 | 0.961 | 0.068 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 967 | 4.384 | 0.976 | 0.031 | 199 | 4.638 | 0.635 | 0.045 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 968 | 4.382 | 0.931 | 0.030 | 199 | 4.578 | 0.630 | 0.045 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 967 | 4.119 | 1.127 | 0.036 | 195 | 4.344 | 0.947 | 0.068 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 893 | 4.236 | 0.971 | 0.032 | 191 | 4.476 | 0.780 | 0.056 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 969 | 4.300 | 1.061 | 0.034 | 199 | 4.613 | 0.671 | 0.048 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 969 | 4.245 | 1.046 | 0.034 | 199 | 4.422 | 0.843 | 0.060 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 769 | 4.092 | 1.012 | 0.036 | 144 | 4.319 | 0.808 | 0.067 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 950 | 4.309 | 0.948 | 0.031 | 197 | 4.462 | 0.746 | 0.053 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 966 | 4.313 | 0.992 | 0.032 | 199 | 4.452 | 0.808 | 0.057 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 964 | 4.384 | 0.929 | 0.030 | 202 | 4.480 | 0.774 | 0.054 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 962 | 4.087 | 1.140 | 0.037 | 202 | 4.332 | 0.905 | 0.064 | |
| College of Education | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 2,215 | 4.476 | 0.739 | 0.016 | 660 | 4.544 | 0.735 | 0.029 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 2,173 | 4.374 | 0.880 | 0.019 | 648 | 4.556 | 0.756 | 0.030 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 2,172 | 4.191 | 0.980 | 0.021 | 649 | 4.279 | 0.951 | 0.037 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 2,197 | 4.479 | 0.782 | 0.017 | 660 | 4.617 | 0.718 | 0.028 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 2,198 | 4.474 | 0.757 | 0.016 | 656 | 4.512 | 0.818 | 0.032 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 2,199 | 4.189 | 1.065 | 0.023 | 656 | 4.276 | 1.039 | 0.041 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 2,154 | 4.384 | 0.828 | 0.018 | 650 | 4.412 | 0.874 | 0.034 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 2,199 | 4.487 | 0.834 | 0.018 | 659 | 4.668 | 0.702 | 0.027 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 2,207 | 4.326 | 0.956 | 0.020 | 657 | 4.434 | 0.879 | 0.034 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 2,130 | 4.101 | 1.043 | 0.023 | 648 | 4.324 | 0.910 | 0.036 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 2,192 | 4.234 | 0.965 | 0.021 | 655 | 4.397 | 0.863 | 0.034 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 2,200 | 4.170 | 1.016 | 0.022 | 659 | 4.338 | 0.959 | 0.037 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 2,199 | 4.336 | 0.919 | 0.020 | 659 | 4.498 | 0.815 | 0.032 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 2,206 | 4.127 | 1.077 | 0.023 | 656 | 4.317 | 0.959 | 0.037 | |
| College of Engineering | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 7,128 | 4.279 | 0.817 | 0.010 | 3,957 | 4.223 | 0.826 | 0.013 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 6,906 | 4.184 | 0.944 | 0.011 | 3,845 | 4.121 | 0.958 | 0.015 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 7,016 | 3.878 | 1.125 | 0.013 | 3,938 | 3.779 | 1.148 | 0.018 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 7,086 | 4.239 | 0.940 | 0.011 | 3,954 | 4.144 | 0.973 | 0.015 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 7,094 | 4.313 | 0.845 | 0.010 | 3,938 | 4.206 | 0.900 | 0.014 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 7,052 | 4.062 | 1.018 | 0.012 | 3,904 | 3.960 | 1.038 | 0.017 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 6,956 | 4.176 | 0.915 | 0.011 | 3,885 | 4.152 | 0.940 | 0.015 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 7,087 | 4.367 | 0.825 | 0.010 | 3,932 | 4.299 | 0.859 | 0.014 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 7,085 | 4.039 | 1.088 | 0.013 | 3,948 | 3.959 | 1.101 | 0.018 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 6,845 | 3.869 | 1.103 | 0.013 | 3,818 | 3.864 | 1.094 | 0.018 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 7,040 | 4.092 | 1.003 | 0.012 | 3,928 | 4.123 | 0.966 | 0.015 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 7,107 | 4.084 | 1.035 | 0.012 | 3,951 | 4.172 | 0.948 | 0.015 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 7,104 | 4.182 | 0.964 | 0.011 | 3,939 | 4.219 | 0.907 | 0.014 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 7,105 | 3.856 | 1.152 | 0.014 | 3,945 | 3.840 | 1.125 | 0.018 | |
| College of Natural Resoures | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 1,180 | 4.386 | 0.732 | 0.021 | 632 | 4.305 | 0.778 | 0.031 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 1,171 | 4.309 | 0.890 | 0.026 | 631 | 4.285 | 0.848 | 0.034 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 1,177 | 4.133 | 0.965 | 0.028 | 626 | 4.005 | 1.006 | 0.040 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 1,175 | 4.381 | 0.837 | 0.024 | 631 | 4.338 | 0.839 | 0.033 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 1,175 | 4.407 | 0.767 | 0.022 | 630 | 4.308 | 0.846 | 0.034 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 1,170 | 4.210 | 0.960 | 0.028 | 630 | 4.117 | 0.978 | 0.039 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 1,164 | 4.314 | 0.853 | 0.025 | 626 | 4.257 | 0.825 | 0.033 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 1,173 | 4.442 | 0.765 | 0.022 | 627 | 4.372 | 0.806 | 0.032 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 1,173 | 4.240 | 0.956 | 0.028 | 631 | 4.119 | 1.005 | 0.040 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 1,146 | 4.065 | 1.010 | 0.030 | 622 | 3.990 | 1.017 | 0.041 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 1,157 | 4.199 | 0.928 | 0.027 | 627 | 4.120 | 0.931 | 0.037 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 1,174 | 4.187 | 0.969 | 0.028 | 625 | 4.080 | 0.989 | 0.040 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 1,170 | 4.340 | 0.877 | 0.026 | 628 | 4.178 | 0.940 | 0.038 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 1,171 | 4.109 | 1.024 | 0.030 | 625 | 3.970 | 1.083 | 0.043 | |
| College of Humanities and Social Sciences | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 17,479 | 4.455 | 0.712 | 0.005 | 3,656 | 4.439 | 0.747 | 0.012 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 16,946 | 4.331 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 3,554 | 4.362 | 0.871 | 0.015 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 17,343 | 4.148 | 1.001 | 0.008 | 3,631 | 4.204 | 0.979 | 0.016 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 17,431 | 4.496 | 0.768 | 0.006 | 3,639 | 4.527 | 0.766 | 0.013 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 17,356 | 4.494 | 0.736 | 0.006 | 3,624 | 4.491 | 0.755 | 0.013 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 17,338 | 4.266 | 0.947 | 0.007 | 3,629 | 4.274 | 0.976 | 0.016 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 16,721 | 4.282 | 0.897 | 0.007 | 3,414 | 4.239 | 0.934 | 0.016 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 17,411 | 4.510 | 0.757 | 0.006 | 3,641 | 4.480 | 0.800 | 0.013 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 17,439 | 4.289 | 0.968 | 0.007 | 3,653 | 4.306 | 0.976 | 0.016 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 17,301 | 4.152 | 0.994 | 0.008 | 3,621 | 4.273 | 0.926 | 0.015 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 17,218 | 4.194 | 0.943 | 0.007 | 3,596 | 4.253 | 0.951 | 0.016 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 17,408 | 4.249 | 0.939 | 0.007 | 3,649 | 4.327 | 0.937 | 0.016 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 17,417 | 4.338 | 0.901 | 0.007 | 3,653 | 4.397 | 0.886 | 0.015 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 17,379 | 4.087 | 1.080 | 0.008 | 3,644 | 4.157 | 1.084 | 0.018 | |
| College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 13,805 | 4.329 | 0.800 | 0.007 | 3,749 | 4.283 | 0.821 | 0.013 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 13,208 | 4.158 | 0.964 | 0.008 | 3,597 | 4.223 | 0.920 | 0.015 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 13,764 | 3.838 | 1.206 | 0.010 | 3,752 | 3.941 | 1.157 | 0.019 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 13,756 | 4.259 | 0.959 | 0.008 | 3,737 | 4.223 | 0.936 | 0.015 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 13,760 | 4.397 | 0.794 | 0.007 | 3,735 | 4.350 | 0.828 | 0.014 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 13,639 | 4.136 | 1.005 | 0.009 | 3,720 | 4.183 | 0.979 | 0.016 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 12,925 | 4.129 | 0.990 | 0.009 | 3,505 | 4.191 | 0.923 | 0.016 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 13,764 | 4.393 | 0.832 | 0.007 | 3,731 | 4.427 | 0.790 | 0.013 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 13,762 | 4.028 | 1.141 | 0.010 | 3,738 | 4.091 | 1.091 | 0.018 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 12,771 | 3.926 | 1.067 | 0.009 | 3,473 | 3.998 | 1.025 | 0.017 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 13,665 | 4.173 | 0.935 | 0.008 | 3,662 | 4.138 | 0.944 | 0.016 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 13,768 | 4.225 | 0.920 | 0.008 | 3,741 | 4.199 | 0.917 | 0.015 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 13,764 | 4.170 | 0.991 | 0.008 | 3,758 | 4.161 | 0.974 | 0.016 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 13,758 | 3.831 | 1.186 | 0.010 | 3,747 | 3.868 | 1.151 | 0.019 | |
| College of Textiles | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 1,279 | 4.504 | 0.683 | 0.019 | 375 | 4.099 | 1.010 | 0.052 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 1,268 | 4.413 | 0.826 | 0.023 | 371 | 4.057 | 1.098 | 0.057 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 1,272 | 4.138 | 1.057 | 0.030 | 372 | 3.516 | 1.329 | 0.069 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 1,276 | 4.474 | 0.795 | 0.022 | 373 | 4.035 | 1.160 | 0.060 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 1,275 | 4.442 | 0.815 | 0.023 | 369 | 4.122 | 1.042 | 0.054 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 1,273 | 4.240 | 0.998 | 0.028 | 374 | 3.682 | 1.325 | 0.069 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 1,263 | 4.445 | 0.766 | 0.022 | 361 | 4.224 | 0.911 | 0.048 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 1,274 | 4.553 | 0.704 | 0.020 | 370 | 4.216 | 1.047 | 0.054 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 1,276 | 4.274 | 0.979 | 0.027 | 370 | 3.730 | 1.328 | 0.069 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 1,195 | 4.173 | 0.975 | 0.028 | 330 | 3.958 | 1.065 | 0.059 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 1,267 | 4.265 | 0.927 | 0.026 | 369 | 3.959 | 1.126 | 0.059 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 1,274 | 4.254 | 0.942 | 0.026 | 369 | 3.973 | 1.137 | 0.059 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 1,273 | 4.402 | 0.809 | 0.023 | 370 | 4.076 | 1.001 | 0.052 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 1,273 | 4.099 | 1.083 | 0.030 | 368 | 3.679 | 1.300 | 0.068 | |
| College of Management | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 6,357 | 4.377 | 0.761 | 0.010 | 1,304 | 4.488 | 0.669 | 0.019 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 6,157 | 4.248 | 0.895 | 0.011 | 1,248 | 4.372 | 0.838 | 0.024 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 6,289 | 3.978 | 1.093 | 0.014 | 1,296 | 4.198 | 0.956 | 0.027 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 6,321 | 4.357 | 0.869 | 0.011 | 1,294 | 4.536 | 0.733 | 0.020 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 6,309 | 4.425 | 0.770 | 0.010 | 1,293 | 4.536 | 0.689 | 0.019 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 6,286 | 4.183 | 0.963 | 0.012 | 1,281 | 4.311 | 0.865 | 0.024 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 6,213 | 4.285 | 0.890 | 0.011 | 1,248 | 4.309 | 0.874 | 0.025 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 6,325 | 4.424 | 0.799 | 0.010 | 1,287 | 4.489 | 0.747 | 0.021 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 6,329 | 4.128 | 1.047 | 0.013 | 1,294 | 4.317 | 0.912 | 0.025 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 6,180 | 4.054 | 1.015 | 0.013 | 1,264 | 4.172 | 0.964 | 0.027 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 6,245 | 4.149 | 0.964 | 0.012 | 1,273 | 4.296 | 0.830 | 0.023 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 6,328 | 4.161 | 0.980 | 0.012 | 1,296 | 4.351 | 0.831 | 0.023 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 6,324 | 4.237 | 0.939 | 0.012 | 1,297 | 4.427 | 0.797 | 0.022 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 6,321 | 3.938 | 1.119 | 0.014 | 1,296 | 4.212 | 0.965 | 0.027 | |
| Division of Undergraduate Academic Programs | 1. The instructor stated course objectives / outcomes | 991 | 4.608 | 0.640 | 0.020 | 31 | 4.323 | 0.832 | 0.149 |
| 2. The instructor was receptive to students outside the classroom | 978 | 4.672 | 0.638 | 0.020 | 31 | 4.645 | 0.551 | 0.099 | |
| 3. The instructor explained difficult material well | 966 | 4.458 | 0.776 | 0.025 | 30 | 4.367 | 0.809 | 0.148 | |
| 4. The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course | 988 | 4.673 | 0.581 | 0.018 | 31 | 4.581 | 0.765 | 0.137 | |
| 5. The instructor was prepared for class | 989 | 4.664 | 0.568 | 0.018 | 31 | 4.387 | 0.919 | 0.165 | |
| 6. The instructor gave prompt and useful feedback | 987 | 4.566 | 0.726 | 0.023 | 31 | 4.226 | 1.087 | 0.195 | |
| 7. The instructor effectively used instructional technology | 966 | 4.509 | 0.725 | 0.023 | 30 | 4.400 | 0.675 | 0.123 | |
| 8. The instructor consistently treated students with respect | 988 | 4.725 | 0.551 | 0.018 | 31 | 4.419 | 0.765 | 0.137 | |
| 9. Overall, the instructor was an effective teacher | 987 | 4.573 | 0.720 | 0.023 | 31 | 4.613 | 0.667 | 0.120 | |
| 10. The course readings were valuable aids to learning | 973 | 4.207 | 1.008 | 0.032 | 31 | 4.516 | 0.677 | 0.122 | |
| 11. The course assignments were valuable aids to learning | 987 | 4.168 | 1.040 | 0.033 | 30 | 4.333 | 0.844 | 0.154 | |
| 12. This course was intellectually challenging and stimulating | 981 | 3.950 | 1.161 | 0.037 | 31 | 4.548 | 0.723 | 0.130 | |
| 13. This course improved my knowledge of the subject | 976 | 4.211 | 0.986 | 0.032 | 31 | 4.516 | 0.677 | 0.122 | |
| 14. Overall, this course was excellent | 987 | 4.143 | 1.036 | 0.033 | 30 | 4.467 | 0.776 | 0.142 | |