(Updated December 2007)
University Planning & Analysis (UPA) conducts periodic assessment of its provided services, processes, and information/data. Based on UPA's mission and defined clients, UPA has developed a set of core outcomes and performance standards, along with appropriate measures to assess the effectiveness of UPA's services, processes and information/data. UPA's objectives are broad statements that reflect what UPA does to ensure that the outcomes can be met. UPA's objectives have also been identified for each of UPA's functional areas. The outcomes and objectives will be considered when developing specific assessment tools (i.e., survey questions).
The mission of University Planning and Analysis (UPA) is to help decision-makers make informed decisions.
This mission is accomplished through UPA’s primary functions that incorporate planning, institutional research and assessment.
UPA's clients include those internal to the institution: NC State's executive officers, deans, department heads, faculty, and students; and those external to the institution: UNC-General administration, Board of Governors, North Carolina legislators, federal agencies and accreditors, other universities, the media, and the general public.
UPA’s performance on all tasks will be:
- Accurate
- Timely
- Useful
- Strategic/proactive
- Efficient
UPA will conduct either a client-based survey or focus group at least every three years. (Next one: 2009-2010) The survey/focus group will focus most heavily on the outcomes identified in this plan, as well as any emerging issues. If a university-wide survey on administrative issues is conducted, UPA will encourage that it includes appropriate questions for assessing UPA. The outcomes and objectives will be considered when developing survey or focus group questions.
Self-evaluation is an effective tool. Each fall, UPA will meet to discuss how well the staff feel UPA is performing on its mission, outcomes, performance standards and objectives. Problems or challenges will be identified.
There may be times when special or routine projects or processes will need a focused assessment. UPA will conduct assessment as needed on these specific issues. In addition, notes from assessment of these projects will be kept for review at the next fall UPA retreat.
By conducting a review of those who use UPA’s website, UPA can gain insight into many of its outcomes. The review of hits will be performed and reviewed each January, conducted on hits for the previous September to November.
Each functional area keeps an on-going “log” regarding how well deadlines for projects are met (i.e., UNC-GA deadlines, survey deadlines, etc), and list of errors that show problems that UPA can correct. These logs will also be reviewed during UPA’s fall retreat.
Assessment Method for Each Outcome and Performance Standard Periodic Client Survey Or Focus Groups- Next: 2009-2010
Periodic Retreat Of UPA Staff – Each Fall
Periodic Assessment Of Specific Projects - As Needed
Annual Review Of Web Hits – Each January
Data Log/ Spreadsheet- On-Going
Outcomes1. Information/data
X X X X X2. Processes
X X X - -3. Progress
X X - - -4. Decision-making
X X - - -5. Satisfaction
X X X X -6. Confidence
X X X X X Performance Standards1. Accurate
X X X - X2. Timely
X X X - X3. Useful
X X X X -4. Strategic
X X X - -5. Efficient
X X X - XX indicates which assessment method will be used with each outcome and performance standard
UPA's objectives are broad statements that reflect what UPA does to ensure that the outcomes can be met. UPA's objectives have also been identified for each of UPA's functional areas. The outcomes and objectives will be considered when developing specific assessment tools (i.e., survey questions).